Transit Oversight, Pollution Profit, School Board Candidates | Hits & Misses | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly

Transit Oversight, Pollution Profit, School Board Candidates 

Pin It
Favorite
news_hits_misses1-1-ee81d7080e93e2b0.jpg
Untitled Document
miss_1.jpg

Transit Oversight
You know what would buoy trust for the Utah Transit Authority in the wake of Proposition 1's failure? How about starting over? How about we just get rid of the "quasi" part of the quasi-governmental organization and put UTA under government control? Certainly, that would solve the problem that UTA bosses are perceived as profiting handsomely with global trips and hefty bonuses at the expense of the bus-riding middle class. Right now, there's no governmental oversight but for a few nasty audits the Legislature dismisses. There was no mention of UTA in Proposition 1, but everyone knows what "transit" meant. No, it wasn't the Koch Brothers who felled Prop. 1. It was UTA itself.

miss_1.jpg

Pollution Profit
If it turned out that there were all kinds of economic benefits to bad air, would you buy it? What if communities profited by polluting your water and weakening the earth you stand on? Just what kind of risk is risky enough to stop the fracking craze? A Deseret News article notes a study by the National Bureau of Economic Research that shows "significant economic benefits" to counties and nearby regions where the oil & gas industries were booming—probably "booming" both literally and figuratively. Employment overall went up some 60 percent. Whoopee! But at what cost? You have to wonder when studies seem like attempts to derail research in alternative energy. If there's less need for oil, there will be less need to frack. Meanwhile, the low price of oil casts a shadow the fracking industry, too.

hit_1.jpg

School Board Candidates
Maybe it took a federal judge's ruling, but Gov. Gary Herbert is out of the social-engineering business, at least as far as the Utah Board of Education is concerned. The governor didn't set up a committee to vet candidates, as the law had allowed. At one time, the committee would interview candidates and submit names to the governor, who picked two lucky winners to appear on the ballot. Each time the law was changed, it was argued that the public didn't know squat, and they needed qualified candidates to be chosen for them. Instead, they were getting the pro-voucher folks. The judge said that biased the ballot. So now, you may not have any idea whom your school board member is, but you'll actually get a chance to check out the candidates. The school board apparently is a popular office to strive for, and lawmakers want to narrow the field. They just don't want you doing it. Stayed tuned for proposed legislation.

Pin It
Favorite

About The Author

Katharine Biele

Katharine Biele

Bio:
A City Weekly contributor since 1992, Biele is the informed voice behind our Hits & Misses and Citizen Revolt columns. When not writing, you can catch her working to empower voters and defend democracy alongside the League of Women Voters.

More by Katharine Biele

Latest in Hits & Misses

  • Training the Media

    Police Pout, Famous for Stupidity
    • Sep 23, 2020
  • Mask Flak

    Cutie Uproar, Rape Kits Caught Up
    • Sep 16, 2020
  • Dare to Care

    Fail to See the Humor, The Reactor Factor
    • Sep 10, 2020
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Focus on the Men

    Some seem to think men leaving the workforce will result in fewer marriages. The Park City School District fires back at a shadowy group. Plus, what's behind those strange mailers you might have received?
    • Nov 27, 2019
  • Fraud Gets a Pass?

    The implications of parents filling out their missionary kids' ballots. Plus, how UTA figures to muck it up again.
    • Aug 14, 2019

© 2020 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation