No Lunch For You | Hits & Misses | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly

No Lunch For You 

Also: TV Time, Zoned Out

Pin It
Favorite

click to enlarge miss_1.jpg
No Lunch For You
Agreed, don’t blame the hapless lunch ladies. You know, the weeping women who wrenched trays of food from unsuspecting children at Uintah Elementary. Yeah, it likely wasn’t their fault that Salt Lake School District was operating on some backward policy that allowed kids to go through a lunch line only to discover that their parents hadn’t paid their bills. But consider this: civil disobedience. Is there no sense of morality, of conscience, that goes beyond corporate policy? Isn’t this how we find ourselves in a totalitarian society? We don’t ask questions, we don’t disobey—we just keep our heads down and do our jobs, not willing to stand for something if it means we lose our jobs. Instead, these lunch ladies lost their purpose—to serve and help kids.  

click to enlarge hit_1.jpg
TV Time
Commercials. Apparently they are more effective than you realize. Two in particular have created quite a buzz this past week. The first resulted in a public apology from Paul Mero of the Sutherland Institute conservative think tank that said, oops, he just misread a nondiscrimination bill, but still blamed sponsor Sen. Steve Urquhart for his “appeasement” (meaning: political concessions to an enemy power). “Tell him to quit appeasing,” Mero tweeted. So Brigham Young University will still be able to ban gays and lesbians from student housing. The second commercial, which aired during the Super Bowl, was a UDOT ad that featured an apparently sleeping child who was actually dead in the backseat of a car. Buckle up, mom driver, or you’re going to fly into the back seat and kill your kid. Hundreds of viewers complained or applauded the ad. Got your attention, didn’t they?

click to enlarge miss_1.jpg
Zoned Out
Talk about overreacting. The University of Utah has decided to close its Red Zone apparel stores because they got criticized in a legislative audit. While the audit didn’t suggest that the U should shut down the stores, it did conjure up the conservative admonition about unfair competition with the private sector. Yes, we all have to be perfectly laissez faire in all we do these days. Actually, the audit only advised that the U not advertise its stores, because that $1.9 million in sales represents lost revenue to tax-paying companies. Never mind that this is a strictly niche market and that the stores do pay property and sales taxes. Oh, and the employees are mostly students. 

Twitter: @KathyBiele

Pin It
Favorite

More by Katharine Biele

  • Pot Heads

    The Deseret News asks a good question:
    • Nov 15, 2017
  • Breathe Clean Fest

    Dark Skies Watch, Joe Hill Day and more.
    • Nov 15, 2017
  • Transforming Glendale

    Sustainability Realized, Homeless Solutions and more.
    • Nov 8, 2017
  • More »

Latest in Hits & Misses

  • Pot Heads

    The Deseret News asks a good question:
    • Nov 15, 2017
  • Shrug

    We'll see where this goes after the less-than-enthusiastic response to the state's Medicaid waiver was finally approved.
    • Nov 8, 2017
  • For Shame

    You have to wonder if voters are stupid or simply apathetic.
    • Nov 1, 2017
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

‚Äč

Readers also liked…

  • Details, Please

    And Barring Bars
    • Jun 1, 2016
  • Balk the Vote

    Nonprofit sets sights on re-energizing young voters.
    • Oct 5, 2016

© 2017 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation