Amendment Madness, Free Legal Aid & Lobbyist Influence | Hits & Misses | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly

Amendment Madness, Free Legal Aid & Lobbyist Influence 

Pin It
Favorite
art12699widea.jpg
sad.jpg
Constitutional Quick Draw
U.S. Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, plans to propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would allow states to veto an action by the federal government if two-thirds of the state legislatures voted to do so. In an article on political website The Daily Caller, Bishop says that it is another “check” in the system. In reality, it’s a stunt designed to tap into tea-party anger, and all of Bishop’s high-minded talking points cannot disguise the naked politics of his proposal. Even more absurd is that, while one of the core rallying cries for tea partiers is a return to the fundamental constitutional principles, conservative congressional Republicans—who are also pushing for a balanced-budget amendment—can’t seem to propose amendments to the “divinely inspired” document fast enough.

smiley.jpg
Justice for All
The state of Utah has expanded the free legal aid offered through the state-funded Self-Help Center to the 1st Judicial District, which includes Cache, Box Elder and Rich counties, and now serves five of the state’s judicial districts. The center offers assistance to people representing themselves in cases where they are not entitled to a public defender and cannot afford a private defender, such as debt collections, divorces, adoptions or custody disputes. While they don’t give legal advice, they help the often-overwhelmed litigants navigate the judicial maze of filings and hearings.

sad.jpg
Power Brokers
One-third of Utah’s legislators received all of their campaign contributions from special interests, while half of them received less than 1 percent of their donations from constituents in their district. That is according to an analysis in The Salt Lake Tribune of campaign finance reports for the 2010 elections that emphasizes how pervasive the influence of lobbyists and political action committees is among Utah’s elected officials. Further, legislators such as Rep. Mike Morley, R-Spanish Fork, are quoted in the article as if they are proud of the fact that they don’t have to ask their constituents for money. Yes, Senate Majority Leader Scott Jenkins, R-Plain City, repeats the argument that transparency is more important than restrictions, since donations do not buy votes—although he does acknowledge that donors are buying access. But those tired arguments, when laid against the stark numbers, sound awfully hollow.
Pin It
Favorite

Speaking of...

About The Author

Josh Loftin

Bio:
Josh Loftin: Twitter | Facebook | News Blog

More by Josh Loftin

Latest in Hits & Misses

  • Environmental 'Protection'

    The "enemy of the people" saves the day, shifting the development discussion and maybe it would be better if we just made the damn cake.
    • Jul 11, 2018
  • High Anxiety

    A new study suggests link between altitude and high teen suicide rates, coal is still king in Utah, for now, and an unhappy former mayor.
    • Jul 4, 2018
  • That's How We Gun

    A Utah gun group takes its message to Chicago, some interesting ideas to secure schools and clean air gets a win no matter how small it is.
    • Jun 27, 2018
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • Hearing Protection, Sex Ed, Public Lands

    We certainly don't want our hunters hassled, especially in the rain, and that is good reason to loosen Utah's already liberal gun laws.
    • Jan 11, 2017
  • Gullible Utahns

    Utahns get a dose of fake news; get to know the state's "dirty lobbyist" and the LDS church's fight against medical marijuana.
    • May 23, 2018

© 2018 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation