Why Another Venue? | Letters | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly

Why Another Venue? 

Pin It
Favorite

I wrote to NewPerfomingArtsCenter.org/feedback, as I had received a postcard from them.

I wanted to share this info with City Weekly readers, as I believe my feelings are the same as many of the “silent majority.” I don’t believe this project is necessary and didn’t realize it was this far along until I got the postcard.

If you agree with me, please write or contact the developers and political leaders. This is our opportunity (albeit, perhaps too late) to have our voices heard. I vehemently oppose this project for the following three reasons:

1. SLC has enough venues that don’t fill up for touring events (think Rio Tinto Stadium). These venues could be upgraded, for a fraction of the cost of a new venue, if there were a proven demand.

2. County and city money would be better spent enhancing the lives of the current population not through occasional entertainment but through thoughtful daily quality-of-life issues—for instance, a larger free-fare zone or numerous other projects that serve the members of the population who live on incomes under $70,000 per year.

3. The people who would be attracted to this venue generally have the disposable income to travel to another city to see a show. While this doesn’t promote tourism to SLC, I don’t see it harming tourism either, if the existing venues are used in smart ways.

I am not anti-arts and culture, nor anti-development, but do not support this endeavor, as it appears to be superfluous to the needs of our city and county.

Thank you for your time reading my objection. And please, decision-makers, consider not going through with this unnecessary build.

LAURA DUKELOW
Salt Lake City

Pin It
Favorite

More by City Weekly Readers

  • Soap Box: March 16-22

    Reader remarks on barking dogs, new DUI law, historic tree removal and more.
    • Mar 29, 2017
  • Soap Box: March 9-15

    Reader feedback on words, laws and punitive solitary confinement.
    • Mar 22, 2017
  • Soap Box: March 2-9

    Reader feedback on local music, Sugar House gentrification and St. Patrick’s Day.
    • Mar 15, 2017
  • More »

Latest in Letters

  • Soap Box: March 16-22

    Reader remarks on barking dogs, new DUI law, historic tree removal and more.
    • Mar 29, 2017
  • Soap Box: March 9-15

    Reader feedback on words, laws and punitive solitary confinement.
    • Mar 22, 2017
  • Soap Box: March 2-9

    Reader feedback on local music, Sugar House gentrification and St. Patrick’s Day.
    • Mar 15, 2017
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • A Strange and Barbaric Practice

    In the well-written City Weekly cover story on circumcision ["Circumcision Decision," Sept. 17], the God of the Jewish, Muslim and Christian religions is credited with beginning this practice: God demands that the 99-year- old Abraham cut off his foreskin in order to prove his loyalty.
    • Sep 23, 2015
  • Click Mates

    For some cyber sex workers, the industry delivers both empowerment and the promise of wealth.
    • Aug 3, 2016

© 2017 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation