If you think America is on a positive moral path regarding how we treat our adversaries, by all means, don’t read him. It will only infuriate you and cause you to purchase more yellow-ribbon magnets. If you think waterboarding isn’t torture, Irvine isn’t for you either. Despite that, he will tell you all you need to know about torture and interrogation—he taught the subjects for 18 friggin’ years!—you still won’t believe what he says, because his information is spread by that germ of liberal media. If you think Abu Graib or Guantanamo are amusement parks for recalcitrant Muslims who should be grateful for a prayer mat and the three square meals provided them daily, you have yet another reason to discard Irvine’s message. After all, don’t we all know by now that two meals a day are plenty—and prayer mats are for non-Christians?
Irvine believes there should be a criminal prosecution for what happened at Abu Graib, where a disturbing amount of sadistic behavior by Americans occurred. Maybe. Like Jack Nicholson’s character Colonel Nathan Jessup says in A Few Good Men, maybe America doesn’t want the truth and can’t handle the truth. It should, though.
It should not just want the truth, but demand it. Just don’t count on it. We may never know the extent of harm caused our citizenry and military due to our national shucking of ethical behavior and moral respect at Abu Graib. That’s because for every voice that considers gang rape, filthy bondage and connecting electrodes to genitals abusive and barbaric, another voice claims such techniques saved American lives.
Which is the quandary for people like Irvine. They’re moral all the time. No time-outs. You all know what you would do if someone rammed a tire iron into a forbidden cavity of one of your loved ones. You’d call it barbaric. You’d want their head. You’d call it torture if the purpose of the ramming was to get information from that person. But, if you are the one doing the dirty work—or ordering it—it has to be for a good and moral cause, right? Shy of sharing DNA with Dick Cheney, Ted Bundy or the Boston Strangler, that’s the only grounds upon which you could justify your behavior.
That sells like sex in 2009 America. By comparison, moral men like David Irvine are selling abstinence. It’s just not the kind of abstinence many so-called conservatives can endorse.