Should Have Gone Deeper 

The May 17 article “Split Personalities” [City Weekly] is troubling. There’s a sensationalistic attitude in the way the interviewees are presented with such limited perspective. Two of the pieces demonstrate this in particular sharpness: those about Phoebe Berrey and Deborah Dean. Both involve gender issues but lack any fundamental context whatsoever. What is the writer trying to say? Why does she focus on these individuals? There’s no way to know.

Without knowing, not just these two but all the stories have the feel of being offered up for snap judgment. We have only the title and subtitles for clues, and both are problematic. The title itself is, as I said, sensationalistic, and it draws an inappropriate connection between the interviewees and a psychological disorder. The interviewees are whole, sound individuals. They are not leading dual lives. They are each one person moving between or uniting different aspects of their lives or identity. And the subtitle implies that the interviewees and anyone who has something in common with them is to be pitied, is only “getting by,” through or despite living with meaning that is unique to them.

Every one of these portraits has a full-length story behind it. Some have been explored before, such as being LDS and gay. Perhaps there’s more to be said on that subject, but there’s also much to say in the less-traveled subjects of evolving gender concepts or challenging the rules of religion. The author speaks to two individuals who address gender and identity yet somehow misses the possibility for more depth. Is this avoidance intentional or accidental? What is the author really trying to say?

Isaac Hoppe
Salt Lake City

Pin It
Favorite

More by City Weekly Readers

  • Popular Thinking; We Need to Fight; Dangerous Lane

    I am a longtime philosophy teacher and am constantly encountering problems with my students when it comes to the relationship between opinion, evidence and expertise.
    • Sep 24, 2014
  • Drink & Ride; Cycling Jam; Thanks for Nothing

    Had to laugh when I read the “Booze Train” letter [Aug. 28, City Weekly], as I was probably one of those riders. Mr. Cotant must have boarded just after the close of the fifth-annual Utah Beer Festival, when hundreds of other responsible drinkers like me chose to ride public transportation rather than drink and drive.
    • Sep 17, 2014
  • More »

Latest in Letters

  • Popular Thinking; We Need to Fight; Dangerous Lane

    I am a longtime philosophy teacher and am constantly encountering problems with my students when it comes to the relationship between opinion, evidence and expertise.
    • Sep 24, 2014
  • Drink & Ride; Cycling Jam; Thanks for Nothing

    Had to laugh when I read the “Booze Train” letter [Aug. 28, City Weekly], as I was probably one of those riders. Mr. Cotant must have boarded just after the close of the fifth-annual Utah Beer Festival, when hundreds of other responsible drinkers like me chose to ride public transportation rather than drink and drive.
    • Sep 17, 2014
  • Booze Trains Are Better Than Booze Cars

    I read a City Weekly letter titled "Booze Train" [Aug. 28] that both angered and saddened me. The letter was written by a Mr. Douglas Cotant who was so offended by the "loud talking" of some mildly inebriated passengers that he threatened to write a letter to the governor asking that "UTA be shut down for allowing patrons who use alcoholic beverages to ride the trains."
    • Sep 10, 2014
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

© 2014 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation