Platitudes as Discourse 

Pin It
Favorite
I wonder who they are, these people of stature who Wayne Holland says will not run against Democratic Congressman Jim Matheson [“Bubble Boy,” March 4, City Weekly].

Are they the several prominent local Democratic politicians who chose not to associate themselves with the Citizens’ Candidate movement for fear of hurting their own political future? Are they the Utah Democratic pundits who are fed up with Matheson’s voting record in Congress, with his refusal to meet with his constituents (unless they have Big Money), with his neutralizing and ill-thought-out responses to questions about health care and other Democrat-supported bills currently in Congress, with his (and his staff’s) disingenuous explanations as to why more than 50 percent of his 2008 campaign contributions came from the health-care industry and pharmaceuticals? Are they the Utah Democrats who really believe that being “pragmatic” (Holland’s term for Matheson) means voting against all progressive social justice bills—in order to appease one’s Republican constituents?

Really? I call this myopic concern with one’s own political future short-term thinking. It has no claim to the fight for real progress. I call this type of centrist “pragmatism” cowardice. I say that people who endorse the status-quo party line are anesthetized by the platitudes that pass for Democratic Party discourse in Utah. I say that calling Matheson more liberal than right-wing Republicans Bishop or Chaffetz is an insult to people in Utah who are still believing in the promise of social change we knew under FDR, Kennedy and Johnson—who still believe in the promise of social change lived and died for by our history’s most courageous activists: the Suffragists, the civilrights marchers, the women’s movement pioneers, the health-care reformers, the climate-change civil-disobedience demonstrators. All of these reformers were called “crazy,” naively optimistic—or worse—when they started. Where would we be today without them?

I call Claudia Wright a person of stature, one who has the courage to stand up for what she believes and act upon it, taking in stride the naysayers’ disillusionment, “neutrality,” and even scorn. As I heard her say at a Citizens’ Candidate meeting the other night: “If not us, who? If not now, when?”

Stephanie Pace
Salt Lake City

Pin It
Favorite

Speaking of...

  • Culture Clash

    What began as a romance between the children of two Afghan families soon spiraled into violence and tragedy
    • Apr 9, 2014
  • Hollywood Vengeance

    Local director Gil Medina says he owns actor Danny Trejo and is suing Robert Rodriguez for $11 million to prove it
    • Apr 2, 2014
  • Best of Utah 2014: Dine & Drink

    Best Pizza Este Pizzeria Pizza is a very personal thing. And for true pizza enthusiasts, the pursuit of the perfect pizza is never-ending. Well, for aficionados searching out thin-crust,
    • Mar 26, 2014
  • More »

More by City Weekly Readers

Latest in Letters

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • A Strange and Barbaric Practice

    In the well-written City Weekly cover story on circumcision ["Circumcision Decision," Sept. 17], the God of the Jewish, Muslim and Christian religions is credited with beginning this practice: God demands that the 99-year- old Abraham cut off his foreskin in order to prove his loyalty.
    • Sep 23, 2015
  • Mike Noel's Resistance to Reason

    I enjoyed Colby Frazier's cover story about state Rep. Mike Noel, R-Kanab ["The Herd Bull of the House," May 14, City Weekly]. I attended the Great Public Lands Gamble Rally at the Capitol in January 2015, at which Noel audaciously stepped up to the microphone to attempt a refutation (the gospel according to St. Mike) of the "lies" being perpetrated by the proponents of public lands.
    • May 20, 2015

© 2016 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation