Offensive Cover 

Pin It
Favorite
Although I don’t believe that it will impact your heavily distributed publication if I stop picking it up, I find it necessary to inform you that I will no longer patronize City Weekly. I find the cover of your Oct. 21, 2010, edition incredibly offensive.

Disregarding the context, of which I am aware, putting the face of a black man along with the title “The Faces of Rape” is racist and bigoted. Pushing oblique stereotypes onto an already marginalized group is a poor move and makes it seem like you have no consideration for your audience.

Utah’s black population is less than 2 percent of the overall population, so, sure, I guess you won’t be impacted heavily if all blacks in Utah stopped reading. Hopefully there are more people than just me, though, who are upset by it.

My reaction to hearing about the cover was, “Where do we live?”

Peter Worden
Salt Lake City

Pin It
Favorite

More by City Weekly Readers

Latest in Letters

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • A Strange and Barbaric Practice

    In the well-written City Weekly cover story on circumcision ["Circumcision Decision," Sept. 17], the God of the Jewish, Muslim and Christian religions is credited with beginning this practice: God demands that the 99-year- old Abraham cut off his foreskin in order to prove his loyalty.
    • Sep 23, 2015
  • Mike Noel's Resistance to Reason

    I enjoyed Colby Frazier's cover story about state Rep. Mike Noel, R-Kanab ["The Herd Bull of the House," May 14, City Weekly]. I attended the Great Public Lands Gamble Rally at the Capitol in January 2015, at which Noel audaciously stepped up to the microphone to attempt a refutation (the gospel according to St. Mike) of the "lies" being perpetrated by the proponents of public lands.
    • May 20, 2015

© 2016 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation