No Grand Juries, No Liberty | Letters | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly

No Grand Juries, No Liberty 

Pin It
Favorite

What is a grand jury? What purpose does it serve? What branch of government does it belong to?

If you can’t answer these questions, you suffer from TRED: a trampling of rights by education deprivation. Trial juries find facts necessary to convict, while grand juries find facts necessary to begin prosecution. Randomly selected citizens are selected and sworn in larger numbers (“grand”) than trial, or “petit” juries. They can also generally inquire and make recommendations to improve government.

Their purpose is to provide a separate form of due process with greater scrutiny when the right to impartiality outweighs the right to a speedy trial. This buffer between the people and overzealous or inactive prosecutors is the only fair way to investigate and prosecute government officials.

The grand jury is assigned to no branch of the government. It’s a constitutional fixture in its own right, of nothing but the people, as their independent political arm of justice. Separated powers are breached when grand juries are reduced to a form of despotism.

Without free public access—where government officers have secret access, and instruct jurors on duties in a culture of jury incompetence—the people’s buffer becomes a puppet for government whims, and corruption is safe. The popular musing that a prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich via grand juries is evidence. A trampling on the grand jury is a trampling on the people.

Just saying “no” to drugs and alcohol frees you from chains of addiction, and saying “don’t TRED on me” with respect to grand juries is the best way to know liberty.

Matthew Falkner
Kaysville

Pin It
Favorite

More by City Weekly Readers

  • Soap Box: Feb. 2-9, 2017

    Reactions to police bodycam footage of Abdi Mohamed, Moab police misconduct, Chaffetz town hall and more.
    • Feb 15, 2017
  • Soap Box: Jan. 26-Feb. 1

    Our readers respond to the Trumpocalypse, Planned Parenthood funding and Rep. Jason Chaffetz.
    • Feb 8, 2017
  • Soap Box: Jan. 19-25

    Our readers respond to Sundance, Utah Legislature and our new president.
    • Feb 1, 2017
  • More »

Latest in Letters

  • Soap Box: Feb. 2-9, 2017

    Reactions to police bodycam footage of Abdi Mohamed, Moab police misconduct, Chaffetz town hall and more.
    • Feb 15, 2017
  • Soap Box: Jan. 26-Feb. 1

    Our readers respond to the Trumpocalypse, Planned Parenthood funding and Rep. Jason Chaffetz.
    • Feb 8, 2017
  • Soap Box: Jan. 19-25

    Our readers respond to Sundance, Utah Legislature and our new president.
    • Feb 1, 2017
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • A Strange and Barbaric Practice

    In the well-written City Weekly cover story on circumcision ["Circumcision Decision," Sept. 17], the God of the Jewish, Muslim and Christian religions is credited with beginning this practice: God demands that the 99-year- old Abraham cut off his foreskin in order to prove his loyalty.
    • Sep 23, 2015
  • Trumped Up

    Donald Trump's candidacy is the political equivalent of professional wrestling
    • Jul 15, 2015

© 2017 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation