Immigration Rhetoric Isn't Working 

Pin It

Immigration advocacy loses its pulpit when it insinuates that racism motivates officials and legislators who deal with border control. Rather than simply making the accusations directly, it draws analogies to the civil-rights era [“Swift Justice,” Dec. 8, 2011; “Deportation Factory,” Feb. 2, 2012; Five Spot, April 12, all City Weekly].

In law, segregated pupils in the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision held unqualified right to equal schools. Immigration is a privilege each country grants or denies at its own discretion. Use of community information sources to discover unauthorized entry is not Jim Crow. The system, neither broken nor operating at random, responds to well-defined pressures from citizens on both sides of this issue.

If the advocates hope to prevail the field, they need better rhetorical tactics than lately seen in the City Weekly.

Jesse Baker

Pin It

More by City Weekly Readers

Latest in Letters


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • A Strange and Barbaric Practice

    In the well-written City Weekly cover story on circumcision ["Circumcision Decision," Sept. 17], the God of the Jewish, Muslim and Christian religions is credited with beginning this practice: God demands that the 99-year- old Abraham cut off his foreskin in order to prove his loyalty.
    • Sep 23, 2015
  • Mike Noel's Resistance to Reason

    I enjoyed Colby Frazier's cover story about state Rep. Mike Noel, R-Kanab ["The Herd Bull of the House," May 14, City Weekly]. I attended the Great Public Lands Gamble Rally at the Capitol in January 2015, at which Noel audaciously stepped up to the microphone to attempt a refutation (the gospel according to St. Mike) of the "lies" being perpetrated by the proponents of public lands.
    • May 20, 2015

© 2016 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation