Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1 

Deathly Hallows, Part 1 faces the challenge of creating a satisfying stand-alone film.

Pin It
click to enlarge art12649widea.jpg
In a sense, it’s patently unfair attempting to evaluate Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1 on its own terms. It’s complicated enough that the film is so deeply informed by the six that have preceded it in the series. But how could this one possibly feel satisfying when audiences are destined to be left hanging smack dab in the middle of the story?

That is, however, the path that the producers opted to take for the climactic storyline—and it’s not as though cinema history dictates inevitable success or failure for films that end with an explicit, or implicit, “to be continued.” The Empire Strikes Back is widely considered the best of the Star Wars series despite its multi-cliffhanger conclusion; ditto with The Lord of the Rings middle segment, The Two Towers. And on the other hand, you’ve got shot-in-succession sequels like The Matrix Reloaded and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest that teased without offering enough satisfactions of their own. This Potter falls somewhere between the two—ambitious and momentous in its way, yet never quite as powerful as it wants to be.

Times are already dark as this chapter of the saga begins. The Ministry of Magic has finally acknowledged the return of Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) and is desperately trying to defend the magical world. Meanwhile, Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) is attempting to remain hidden from Voldemort’s Death Eaters, but it seems impossible to stay a step ahead of them. Eventually, he goes on the run with only Hermione (Emma Watson) and Ron (Rupert Grint), determined to find and destroy the mysterious remaining Horcruxes, each of which houses a shard of Voldemort’s soul.

J.K. Rowling’s series had turned into a remarkable allegory for militant racism by its final installment, and director David Yates—returning from the previous two films—effectively captures a magical world that has become something akin to Vichy France. Terrific sequences in the Ministry of Magic peek in on the mass creation of anti-“muggle” propaganda and kangaroo courts to find those of unpure blood. It’s a lot of thematic weight to carry, but Hallows does so deftly.

Yates and screenwriter Steve Kloves also get to spend a lot of time simply exploring the interaction between our three primary protagonists—and it’s here that the film gets into tricky territory. There’s no way a single Deathly Hallows film would have had time to allow the character moments to breathe, so it’s impressive that we wind up with huge chunks of screen time devoted to Harry, Ron and Hermione struggling with their solitude and their roles in this epic struggle. But while there’s an undeniable chemistry between these three young actors after a decade playing these characters together, it’s also true that they’re … well, three young actors. Previous films have buffered their relative inexperience with the significant roles played by terrific supporting characters. Here, Radcliffe, Grint and Watson have to carry plenty of emotional scenes—and as likeable as they all are, they don’t always have the gravitas required of the material.

The longer expository sections also draw attention to the relative scarcity of action beats, and to Yates’ struggles with the big set pieces. The battle sequences in Deathly Hallows move at a speed that often makes it impossible to figure out exactly what’s going on. While the action scenes in Yates’ Order of the Phoenix and Half-Blood Prince were far from perfect, it never seemed like this much of an effort to make it through the frantic editing.

Yet for all its bumps and unevenness, this is still a film series that has grown remarkably potent with age, evolving from Chris Columbus’ earnest, overly faithful amusement park rides in the first two installments into our hero’s challenging journey to manhood. We get to visit again with favorite characters like Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton) and Dobby the house elf (Toby Jones), and to see the heroes we first knew as children learning what it means to survive on their own. It’s hard to imagine that, when the screen goes black at our cliffhanger moment, viewers will be left thinking they’ve seen their favorite film in the series. The effectiveness of Part 1 becomes a function almost entirely of what has come before—and what we know is still to come.


click to enlarge 3_stars.gif

Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint
Rated PG-13

Scott Renshaw

Pin It

Speaking of...

More by Scott Renshaw

Latest in Film Reviews

  • Symbol Minded

    At least Inferno brings some goofiness to its absurd plot.
    • Oct 26, 2016
  • Fall Flicks

    Our picks for the "awards season" movies most worth getting excited about.
    • Oct 19, 2016
  • Making a Statement

    American Honey offers a terrific slice of life, whenever it's not trying too hard.
    • Oct 12, 2016
  • More »


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • Where Are the Women?

    A critic's year-long deep-dive into the way movies portray one half of humanity.
    • May 11, 2016
  • Beasts of One Notion

    Zootopia depends entirely on its well-intentioned allegory about prejudice.
    • Mar 2, 2016

© 2016 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation