Forced Adoptions 

Pin It

I’m a longtime fathers-rights advocate. I write and edit the blog and am on the board of directors of the nonprofit Fathers & Families.

I’ve researched and written on putative-father registries (PFR) and adoption for a dozen years, and I found your piece to be the best single article on the subject I’ve ever read [“Some Call It Kidnapping,” July 29, City Weekly]. It’s informative and passionate at the same time. It’s not didactic, but has a definite point of view.

I have a couple of things I wish you’d included in your piece: First is the fact that what PFRs do, and what the State of Utah does, is force adoption on children who don’t need it. All of the children you discussed have capable, willing fathers, so they don’t need to be adopted. But, of course, there are millions of children worldwide who do need adoptive parents. There are many more of those children than there are parents wanting to adopt. Therefore, by forcing adoption on a child who doesn’t need it, Utah and other states effectively deprive a child who does need to be adopted.

The other point is how little is known of the statutes requiring registry with the PFR and the procedure for doing so. In Texas, the state budgets no money to publicize either the registry or the consequences of not filing. The statute requires that forms be maintained in a variety of public locations such as courthouses, justices of the peace, etc.

But, when I tried to locate the forms in a number of the required places, I struck out. They weren’t there, and no one knew what I was talking about. When I conducted an informal poll of Houston men, not one out of the hundred I asked had ever heard of the Texas Paternity Registry. In the year I was doing my research, about 110,000 children were born out of wedlock in Texas. The same year, fewer than 100 men registered. My guess is that Utah is similar.

Thanks again for an excellent piece.

Robert Franklin
Utopia, Texas

Pin It

More by City Weekly Readers

  • Soap Box: Oct. 6-12

    • Oct 19, 2016
  • Soap Box: Sept. 22-28

    Our readers have spoken! Here's what they had to say about Five Wives vodka, Utah Valley's predictable billboards, Jason Christiensen's apology for anti-LGBTQ comments and more.
    • Oct 5, 2016
  • Soap Box, Sept. 15-21

    • Sep 28, 2016
  • More »

Latest in Letters


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • A Strange and Barbaric Practice

    In the well-written City Weekly cover story on circumcision ["Circumcision Decision," Sept. 17], the God of the Jewish, Muslim and Christian religions is credited with beginning this practice: God demands that the 99-year- old Abraham cut off his foreskin in order to prove his loyalty.
    • Sep 23, 2015
  • Mike Noel's Resistance to Reason

    I enjoyed Colby Frazier's cover story about state Rep. Mike Noel, R-Kanab ["The Herd Bull of the House," May 14, City Weekly]. I attended the Great Public Lands Gamble Rally at the Capitol in January 2015, at which Noel audaciously stepped up to the microphone to attempt a refutation (the gospel according to St. Mike) of the "lies" being perpetrated by the proponents of public lands.
    • May 20, 2015

© 2016 Salt Lake City Weekly

Website powered by Foundation