citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page

Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
News Blog

Bill to raise food sales tax passes committee

by Eric S. Peterson
- Posted // 2011-02-22 -

In an early morning committee meeting Sen. J. Stuart Adams, R-Layton presented his bill to increase the sales tax on food. He was careful not to say the words “tax increase” however, arguing the bill lowered the overall sales tax rate.

“This bill simply lowers the overall sales tax rate from 4.7 to 4.4 percent, it broadens the base,” Adams told the committee. Low-income advocates however lined up to remind the committee that lowering the overall rate of sales tax by increasing the food sales tax is still a tax increase. Steve Erickson, from the Crossroads Urban Center, argued that such rate adjustments “paved over the interests” of Utah’s low-income citizens.

Adams tersely responded that the rate adjustment was needed to stabilize the tax rate which fills the state’s general fund. “The state of Utah does not run on a three-legged stool, it runs on a one-legged stool—sales tax,” Adams argued. “It’s important that it be stabilized.”

Linda Hilton, Director of the Coalition of Religious Communities challenged the bill being revenue neutral. “This is a tax increase for low-income people,” Hilton told the committee. “It hits people where they live.”

In discussion from the committee, Sen. Ben McAdams, D-Salt Lake City echoed the comments of low-income advocates and argued that perhaps an earned income tax credit might help relieve some of the burden on low-income Utahns. “An earned-income tax credit is much more laser-like way to provide relief to low-income Utahns,” Adams said, otherwise he argued a higher sales tax rate could affect the amount of money that makes it into the general fund.

Erickson with the Crossroads Urban Center in a separate interview likes the idea of an earned-income tax credit, he also says it’s a bill him and his colleagues have been trying unsuccessfully to get passed in the Legislature since the ‘80s. “Trying to pass progressive tax policy is like spitting in the wind,” Erickson says. “I know because I’ve been doing it for years.”

He argues that even such a measure if passed would not help most working poor anyway, since earned-income tax credits would only aid parents with dependents and therefore would exclude low-income single adults and senior citizens. Ultimately, despite rhetoric of lowering rates and being revenue neutral, Erickson sees a very simple inequality in a bill that lowers general sales tax rates by increasing the sales food tax. “You’ll save more on buying your Ferrari than you will buying groceries,” he says.

The bill was passed favorably out of committee with 6 yes votes to 2 no votes.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // February 22,2011 at 13:35

If the State of Utah is interested in generating money to run the government, may I make a suggestion? Of course, this will NeVER happen, but why not have a head tax for every child that goes to public school? Yes, I know, there would be rioting in the streets if every family with 8 children had to actually pay for their little darlings to get an education! Obviously, it's up to the single people of the state to take up the slack and pay for children that aren't even their own.

Parents -- if you want children, that's just fine. But be prepared to pay for them and not pass the proverbial buck!

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // February 22,2011 at 12:53

Lower taxes on the rich and raise them on the middle class & poor, especially in proportion to their income. The well-compensated, amoral Repugs in the Utah legislature are just lackeys for the ever-greedier, amoral filthy rich, helping them to continue stealing the wealth & power of the middle class & poor for themselves.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // February 22,2011 at 11:53

How does increasing the sales tax on food lower the overall sales tax? This needs to be explained.

 

Posted // February 28,2011 at 18:29 - Sorry I didn't see your question earlier. The bill would raise the tax on food but lower it on other goods. So as the example goes you might save money buying a new car, but not if you're buying food. Obviously this worries low-income advocates since poor folks spend more of their budget on food. Thanks ESP

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close