citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page

Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
News Blog

Censorship Fight

by Josh Loftin
- Posted // 2009-10-15 -

Media Matters: Biased Deseret News story on Dallin Oaks speech made it to print over the howls of many. Plus, a call to arms for readers.

There was apparently swearing, shouting, and multiple attempts from among the Deseret News staffers to work in some sort of balance into the story about the speech made by Dallin Oaks, a member of the LDS Church's Quorom of the Twelve In that speech, Oaks compared the criticism of Mormons for their Prop. 8 support to the violent, and often deadly, acts taken against blacks in the South during the civil rights fight.

That story, which I blogged about yesterday, was essentially a one-source (Oaks himself) rehash of the speech. The Trib, on the other hand, focused on whether the analogy was appropriate (no) or offensive, especially to blacks (yes).

Following my blog, I have been contacted by about a half-dozen D-News staffers giving me behind-the-scenes details—some of them were observers, some of them actually work in other departments, and some of them were actually part of the fray. All of them say that there was a lot of noise made in the newsroom by both editors and reporters, and the language employed fell well outside the bounds people might expect from an LDS Church-owned business.

I've also been told, by multiple people, that there was a push to get comment from, at the very least, a group like the NAACP and a gay rights group because, after all, they are the people beating and firehosing the Mormons. That was not allowed by upper management. When the final product was "put to bed," more than a few staffers went home a little less proud to be working for a prominent daily newspaper.

On the flipside, I also heard from a couple of staffers who told me that only a few reporters were openly angry about the censorship, which was disappointing to them. In truth, it did not surprise me, because this fight has been had so many times that drawing swords over a foregone conclusion only puts you on the wrong-side of your boss, something most people tend to try and avoid doing.

What to take out of this? Foremost, Deseret News staffers still care about the product they are putting out and are willing to fight for it. Secondly, it's important to note that people actually do swear at the Deseret News, and not softly.

Finally, it reinforces the point I made in the previous post. This was a case of deliberate censorship on the part of the Deseret News leadership, and a direct violation of what should be the compact every media outlet makes with its readers: fairness and transparency. This was simply propoganda.

A newspaper is a vibrant part of any community, and in Salt Lake City we are extremely lucky to have two daily newspapers. Very few cities can boast that, including many cities much, much bigger than SLC. However, as part of that community, newspapers need support just like any other civic institution.

No, I'm not suggesting financial bailouts, but moral support for those fighting for objectivity in one of the primary local media outlets. There a few simple yet effective ways to do this:

    • Letters to the Editor: Flood the D-News at letters@desnews.com with commentary about the Oaks speech, positive or negative. If you want, specifically criticize or applaud the way they handled the story. Write what you genuinely feel, in your own words.

    • Comment on the story: There are hundreds of comments about this story online, which shows people care. Add your voice to the din.

    • Hug a reporter, editor, copy editor, whatever. In other words, let them know that you support them. This could be an e-mail to somebody you know at the paper, it could be a phone call, it could be a word of encouragement when you see them scribbling in their notebook on a story assignment. Because even if they aren't vocal about their concerns, trust me—most people at the D-News, in every department (except Mormon Times or Church News), are very concerned.

    •Finally, let the two people actually making these decisions know what you think: Rick Hall, managing editor's e-mail is rhall@desnews.com, and Pulitzer Prize-winning reader Joe Cannon (also editor-in-chief) is cannon@desnews.com.

Disclosure: I worked at the Deseret News for almost a decade as a reporter and editor, and my grandfather was the chairman of the board from 1996-2006. Although I was a vocal critic of Cannon's "More Mormon" emphasis in the last couple of years, I was not fired or forced out, but left willingly to work for City Weekly a couple of months ago. 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // October 16,2009 at 06:31

Finally. Someone has the forum to be able to write about the state of journalism. It is being threatened. As a broadcast journalist, I see and experience it everyday. It doesn't just happen at the D-News or KSL (we know they're owned by the LDS Church).

p.s. a KSL reporter admitted to me during the gay rights rally at temple square that scripts were pre-approved and live shots were arranged to make it look as if there weren't "that many people" fighting for gay rights. Talk about censorship.

What's most disturbing: censorship is everywhere in the media today. You think we make the decisions about the stories we tell? It is upper management, often times incompetent, micro-managing fools who have never been journalists. But they sure as hell claim to be! Do you think journalists fight to have a voice? Very few do, and the ones who do (I happen to be one) find themselves being backed into a corner by management. When journalism is funded through advertising dollars, don't expect news worthy stories. But a bailout isn't the answer either; we don't want to be censored by the government.

The solution? Journalism (T.V., newspapers) needs to be funded by the public like a non-profit organization with anonymous donations. I shouldn't have to care about what our damn lead-in to the newscast is to determine what's relevant to viewers. But those are the types of "things" that are discussed in news meetings. You want transparency? You'll never get it as long as T.V. stations and newspapers are run by for-profit organizations.

Now stand up and fight for journalism, which is PROTECTED BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. Let's not forget it.

-A local news girl

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close