citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page
Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
News Blog

Animal activists keep pressing on at the U

by Jesse Fruhwirth
- Posted // 2010-04-20 -

On the heels of a successful legislative session, the Salt Lake Animal Advocacy Movement (SLAAM) took to the streets, picketing University of Utah researchers who use animals in their research, or vivisectors, to use the activists' term. New legislation passed in 2010 ended the requirement on animal shelters to sell pound puppies (and kitties, too) to research labs. With newfound freedom, the Davis County Animal Shelter has already announced they'll no longer sell animals to research labs.

That legislative success followed an eight-month undercover investigation of labs at the University of Utah by a volunteer for the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and resulting protests. The activists are definitely pleased with the results.

But, as you may know, SLAAM and PETA aren't going to give up until animal testing is completely ended. Hence today's demonstration. About 20 demonstrators carrying signs and bellowing from a bullhorn organized at the top of President's Circle then marched a short distance to the Biology Building.

Consider this the latest chapter in a debate that is, at least, 144 years old (The American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals was founded in 1866). Really, the American animal rights debate, though, is older than America itself. The Puritans in 1641 drew up a list of rights; #92 was "No man shall exercise any Tirranny or Crueltie towards any brute Creature which are usalie kept for man's use." I imagine there was at least a little debate before they decided to include that one.

note: Both facts in the above paragraph are taken from Deborah Blum's "Monkey Wars" (Oxford University Press, 1994), which was derived from Pultizer Prize-winning articles Blum wrote in years prior. Full disclosure: Blum was also my journalism professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // April 21,2010 at 10:52

Stop the madness! You guys can do your tests on Cabbage Patch dolls with the same efficacy! I'd much rather take medicine or undergo a medical procedure that was developed using Cabbage Patch dolls than a cute little puppy.

Of course, we could always use prisoners as test subjects:

Scientist - "Okay John, we're just going to apply some of this mist to your retina. See what happens."

Prisoner - "You ain't touchin' my retuna boy. Ain't no mothafucka touchin' my retuna. Nobody said this was some homersexule test. I ain't no fag."

Scientist - "What? No. Your retina is located in your eye, John."

Prisoner - "Oh. Shit boy. I thought you was wantin' to feel up my sac or somethin'. Mothufucka gets enough a that shit in the pen."

Scientist - "So, are you ready?"

Prisoner, facing spray bottle and opening eyes wide - "Oh yeah man. Spray away. Anything to get a little time away from the box."

* Scientist mists subjects left eye *

Prisoner - "That feels kind of good boy. Soothin' like. Wait. No wait. There's a little...IT BURNS! OH JESUS IT BURNS! IT FEELS LIKE GLASS!!"

Scientist speaks into mic as John's left eye liquifies, dripping from his cheek and pooling on the floor - "Subject displays marked displeaseure with Johnson and Johnson contact cleaning solution # 45142374. The compound's usage may be better applied to adhesive removers, maybe paint thinner."

"Okay, John. Here's a tissue and a check for five dollars, as promised. Go wipe up your eye and we'll get you home..."

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // April 20,2010 at 21:01

FYI, the website behind the campaign is www.stoptestingonpets.com

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close