citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page

Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / News Articles /  Kiss Off: A gay couple cited for holding hands on Main Street Plaza.
News Articles

Kiss Off: A gay couple cited for holding hands on Main Street Plaza.

By Eric S. Peterson & Ted McDonough
Posted // July 10,2009 -

What better image of a friendly, walkable city can there be than a seeing a couple stroll along the charming Main Street Plaza after enjoying a free evening concert: holding hands, engaged in small talk, taking in the night air. It’s picture perfect. Unless the couple happens to be gay.

On Thursday night, Derek Jones (right) and boyfriend Matt Aune claim they were simply holding hands, walking through the LDS Church’s easement between North and South Temple on Main Street, when they inadvertently became a target for LDS Church security officers. For their public display of affection on church property, the couple say they were detained by officers and even handcuffed. Jones was forced to the asphalt.


Following the Thursday Twilight concert, Jones, an advertising account manager for City Weekly, says he and his boyfriend thought they were alone on the plaza as they walked to their home to Capitol Hill around 11 p.m. It was a walk they’d taken on many occasions. The couple paused for a moment, Aune put his arm around Jones and gave him a kiss on the cheek. At that moment, Jones says, a number of security guards descended upon them.


“They said they wanted us to leave because of the public display of affection, and that they do not allow any sort of public displays of affection on the easement whatsoever,” Jones says.


Representatives of the LDS Church would not return calls to comment on this story.


Aune said that once officers detained them, he challenged them to find out what they were doing that was actually wrong. “I was trying to get the real reason out of them, which obviously was they were targeting us because we were a gay couple," Aune says.


MainStreetPlaza3.jpgAs Aune pressed officers to explain, the couple says as many as half a dozen security officers responded to the call. In between security officers allegedly telling the couple their behavior was “unnatural” and “just wrong,” the pair were split up. Jones says he was forced to the ground on his stomach and handcuffed and that Aune was also detained and cuffed. Both, he said, were searched by church security.


“At no time did we ever refuse to leave,” Aune says. “After we were in handcuffs, they said, ‘You can leave, or we can call the police.’” Officers of the Salt Lake City Police Department arrived and issued the pair misdemeanor citations for trespassing. SLCPD spokeswoman Robin Snyder could not comment to specific details of the incident but did say that on private property, individuals who are said to be refusing to leave are subject to trespassing violations.


Karen McCreary, executive director of the ACLU of Utah, was not familiar with the incident. She notes that the Main Street Plaza has been private property since 2003 when the Salt Lake City Council relinquished public easements over the property in exchange for LDS Church-owned property on Salt Lake City’s west side and money to build the Sorenson Unity Center at 1383 S. 900 West.


The 2003 city-church land swap, and the ACLU lawsuit that followed, were the final act in an eight-year battle over the plaza. When the city initially sold a portion of Main Street to the LDS Church in 1999, the sale came with four public easements, including an easement for the public to use the plaza as a through street between South Temple and North Temple. But the public easement came with all sorts of behavior rules (forbidding things such as swearing) and the subsequent arrest of a Christian preacher on the plaza began the first of two lawsuits that would take the plaza issue to federal court.


The ACLU sued Salt Lake City, arguing that the plaza conduct restrictions were unconstitutional.

In 2002, the federal 10th Circuit Court agreed with the ACLU. But one line in the court’s ruling said the city could get around the problem by getting rid of the easements. That’s what the City Council did in 2003. The ACLU sued again, arguing that the city couldn’t sell the public’s rights. The ACLU likened the city-church deal to Southern cities deeding public parks to private groups in an effort to avoid desegregation. But the 10th Circuit Court upheld the city-church deal, which allowed the creation of the private plaza that only looks like a public space.


"This is what [the LDS Church] claimed in 2003 would never happen,” Aune says. “When the controversy over the easement was high, they said it was a paperwork issue. It wasn't. We knew it back then. They want to filter activity through that plaza."

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // June 23,2011 at 18:17

Holding hands on the Main Street Plaza? Holy horror of horrors, somebody call Gayle Ruzicka and have her break out the UglyLady Battalion. There's public displays of affection to be legislated against. BETWEEN TWO MEN??? OMG! Hide the children and somebody escort the missionaries off the property. They'll get 'tainted' by the urge to touch. Not that missionaries EVER touch one another. Oh no, never.

Well Messrs. Jones and Aune should be grateful that SLPD didn't shoot them dead on sight. Or, taser their young asses. I mean, holding hands on the Main Street Plaza? Unheard of.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // July 24,2009 at 16:33

"The hypocrisy just kills me sometimes"

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // July 24,2009 at 16:30

"The hypocrisy just kills me sometimes"

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // July 23,2009 at 20:02

After living in slc most of my life, I'm glad to see that the rest of the country is seeing what this nutty organzation is up to. Keep up the good work mossbacks, the rest of the country has already figured you out.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // July 22,2009 at 13:00

Well, suit yourself. All this talk about equal rights and equality and liberty, blah, blah, blah.

All I'm saying is the you will not alter the core doctrine or moral values of the LDS Church by trespassing or sitting in. They cannot afford to appear to let up on their "moral outrage" over homosexuality.

Perhaps the challenge should be to the LDS Church's tax-free status. But again, its tough when it's a simple property rights issue.

 

 
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 Next »
 
Close
Close
Close