citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page

Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Movies & TV / Film Reviews /  Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
Film Reviews

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Clock of the Bay: Something’s amiss with the Transformers director’s internal sense of pacing.

By Scott Renshaw
Posted // June 24,2009 -

Over the past 14 years, Michael Bay has directed eight features, including Armageddon, Pearl Harbor and 2007’s original Transformers; the average length has been 145 minutes. His only feature to come in under two hours was his first (Bad Boys), which clocked in at a relatively spry 118 minutes. Notorious super-size director James Cameron has released exactly one movie to theaters as long as the average Bay epic, a little number called Titanic; even Peter Jackson sports a career average of just 137 minutes, and that’s counting the mammoth Lord of the Rings films. No other 21st-century filmmaker appears to be more in love with the sound of his own cinematic voice.

So there’s an almost sublime irony to the scene in Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen in which the disgraced ex-agent Simmons (John Turturro) chastises an ancient Autobot for his rambling exposition: “Beginning, middle, end. … Plot. Condense. Tell it.”

Had Bay taken the advice offered by screenwriters Ehren Kruger, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, he finally might have been able to turn out a film as devoted to efficient storytelling as it is to big kabooms. Instead, he presides over another dump of bloated back-story connecting kick-ass fights between giant robots. In the two years since the last film, Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) has graduated from high school and is on his way to college; the remaining Autobots, including Optimus Prime (Peter Cullen), work with the American military to root out lingering Decepticons. What heretofore unknown goal keeps the Decepticons hanging around Earth? What long-held grudge motivates the Decepticon leader, referred to only as The Fallen (Tony Todd, erstwhile Candyman)? What secrets of the Autobot/Decepticon civilization does Sam carry around in his head as a result of touching a shard of the All-Spark? Will Mikaela (Megan Fox) finally get Sam to say the “L” word?

I’m going to go out on a limb to suggest that, for the average viewer who whooped it up at the original Transformers, the answer to all of those questions might be a rousing “who cares?” They come to see rockin’, sockin’ robots, and at times it’s clear that Bay knows exactly how to deliver them. There’s a great early sequence in which the aforementioned All-Spark splinter turns the Witwickys’ kitchen appliances into critters that look and behave suspiciously like electronic Gremlins (thanks, exec producer Steven Spielberg). Individual fight and chase sequences actually feel more cohesive than they generally have in Bay films. There’s cool stuff here, if you’re prepared to wait for it.

But you do often have to wait for it, and wade through a lot of garbage. Bay and company pack the story with needless and distracting subplots, including a pot-brownie trip-out by Sam’s oblivious mom (Julie White) and a pair of comic-relief Autobot “twins” (voiced by Tom Kenny) that come off as grotesquely insulting caricatures of “streetwise” hip-hop youngsters. Autobot military liaison Lennox (Josh Duhamel) deals with a dickish new government overseer (John Benjamin Hickey). Sam’s new college roommate (Ramon Rodriguez) tags along to provide shrieking reaction takes. Stuff just keeps happening, as though no one had the ability—or the nerve—to tell Bay that not every idea that pops into his head belongs on screen.

To make matters even more confusing, it sometimes feels as though Bay is taking the opportunity to pay tribute to every cool action movie he ever loved—and not just the already-noted Gremlins homage. The interaction between The Fallen and Megatron (Hugo Weaving) feels exactly like Emperor Palpatine and Darth Vader; a chase involving a Decepticon who has taken the shape of a hot college babe plays like a fusion of Terminators 2 and 3. It’s Bay’s way of inviting himself to the action-director pantheon party, and you’re paying for it.

It’s a shame that Bay doesn’t know how to give ample time to the ideas that do work: Turturro’s ferociously determined Simmons; the notion of legendary Autobot “Primes” scattered over North America in the dormant form of vintage vehicles; watching Megan Fox run in slow-motion while wearing a tank top, as though auditioning for a Baywatch reboot. It doesn’t take narrative subtlety to make a Transformers movie work. It just takes common sense, a little self-discipline and focus on a few simple words: Plot. Condense. Tell it.

TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN
2_5_stars.gif
Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, John Turturro
Rated PG-13

twitterers.jpg

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // June 28,2009 at 17:27

I feel reluctant to add a comment considering what that other fellow had to say, however, I agreed with most of what you say in your review. I never thought the first film was brilliant, but the sequel was overwhelmingly bad. I took a 4 year old, a 10 year old, and a 17 year old, and they all thought it was great.

However, as you pointed out, much of the film seemed as though I had seen it before and the "homages" to Gremlins, Star Wars, Terminator, etc. seemed unnecessary. However, as I read your review I kept waiting for the reference to Raiders of the Lost Ark. You did not make it, but I suddenly remembered how similar the whole "key to the matrix" part of the plot- OH, I guess we should add "Matrix" to the list considering those slimy alien life pods- how much that part of the plot reiterates Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade- recovering the sacred, life restoring artifact from the exact same temple in Petra, protected by ancient, self sacrificing warriors, etc, then using it to bring back Dr. Jones, I mean Optimus- well, you get the picture.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // June 28,2009 at 00:09

You have to be absolutely crazy to believe a word of this disgrace of a review. Scott clearly has no clue what he is talking about when it comes to reviewing movies. Just because you have the patients of a 3 year old doesn’t mean that anything other then the action was garbage. it just shows what little you know about successful movies... what u call unnecessary sub plot is called comedy you moron... you are clearly lacking a sense of humor. You need to understand that you can’t have a good movie with just robots fighting and you are a damn fool for thinking otherwise. All the little additions are like adding more detail to a work of art which just makes it better. You must understand that people love to laugh and just because you’re a sad little pessimist doesn’t mean everyone else is. In fact, I believe you’re alone in your opinion of this fantastic movie at least for the people that watched this movie instead of listening to your crackpot criticism. I suggest you make a real review of this amazing film which deserves nothing less then 5/5. There are only 3 films that I’ve seen that people clapped and cheered once it ended. 2 of those were the first transformers and its sequel. You should be ashamed of this pathetic excuse you consider a review. I feel sorry for anyone who reads this load of bull and believes it. This film was amazing and had my heart racing from beginning to end.

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close