citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page
See Full Calendar
Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Cover Story /  No Good Choice Page 3
Cover Story

No Good Choice Page 3

Why Rusty Speake gave up her adopted daughter.

By Carolyn Campbell
Posted // March 9,2011 -

Hesitant to Bond
Speake’s situation is not isolated, according to Susan Resko, director of the National Child and Adolescent Bipolar Foundation (CABF). She wrote in a recent blog that some children with severe mental-health needs are too ill to live in a traditional family setting. Residential treatment costs more than most American families earn in a year, and there is a severe shortage of treatment facilities that accept very young children. “We know painfully well how a child’s psychiatric illness can tear apart the fabric of even the most loving families,” says Resko.

CABF recently surveyed its members to learn if parents who were faced with this dilemma were willing to be interviewed on national TV. Thirty-four parents responded affirmatively. “Many of my friends and acquaintances with neurotypical children commented how unfathomable it is that families are faced with this ‘choice,’” Resko writes.

In the wake of caustic online comments that followed the September 2010 publication of a similar family’s story in the Chicago Tribune, Resko was quoted as saying, “There would be a national outcry if families were forced to relinquish custody of a child with cancer in order to receive treatment. Yet, when it involves mental illness, we still look for reasons to blame. It’s high time we as a nation address the shameful way we treat children with mental illness and their families.”

Speake’s two adopted sons are both Emily’s biological brothers, whom Speake has also adopted. They were all born from the same drug-addicted mother. “All three were born with heroin and cocaine in their systems. Emily’s situation was the worst—she had black-tar heroin in her system and spent 23 days in University Hospital withdrawing from that,” says Speake. Today, Emily shows multiple signs and symptoms of reactive-attachment disorder, which often occur “with kids who have been in and out of orphanages and haven’t bonded,” Speake explains. “The confusion over that causes people to ask me, ‘Haven’t you had her since birth?’ If she has reactive-detachment disorder, it is because she spent the first six months of her life withdrawing from heroin. The physical withdrawal is so intense that they can’t emotionally bond.”

Having children was a long-sought goal that Speake once thought was beyond her reach. She was married at 19 for one year and had no children. In her second marriage, she gave birth to one now-grown daughter, April. After that marriage ended in divorce, she still longed for more children. Yet, when she suffered a miscarriage during her third marriage, her husband responded with, “I haven’t been honest with you. I don’t want a baby, and I never will. I’m glad you lost it.” When she didn’t remarry or have another child, Speake decided to pursue “legal-risk” foster care, where children are not legally free for adoption until birth parents terminate their rights.

.

Prenatal Addiction

Julien Smith, Ph.D., is a pediatric neuropsychologist in Salt Lake City who has evaluated children born with various addictions. “As our brain begins to develop early in gestation,” she says, “even before a woman knows she is pregnant, the use of substances or even poor prenatal care can impact that development. Even prior to conception, the health and general behavior of the mother can affect development. The brain really starts developing early in conception—about Day 3—when the neurons in the brain are actually starting to organize themselves and get in place to be prepared to do their future task or activity,” she says.

“The experiences in gestation and any potential toxin in gestation can impact the organizational framework of the developing brain. During gestation, when things are chemically disrupted or disturbed by trauma, then that neurological development and the diversification and specialization of neurons is then altered chemically, functionally and structurally. Those abnormalities have lasting effects on brain area. Any time you are exposing a fetus to a toxin that potentially impacts neurodevelopment, there is a risk factor for inappropriate development.”

She adds, “While we clearly know toxins aren’t good for a developing fetus, it’s not the only piece of the puzzle. What are the genetics that went into the birth mother’s own disorder? Was something going on psychiatrically? There are so many pieces of the puzzle when interpreting developmental disabilities. A combination of bad genetics, bad behavior and toxins can impact the child’s development from the moment they are conceived. You get a neurological system that didn’t develop appropriately from the outset.”

Regarding Emily’s current situation, Smith says. “These challenges are the nature of our system. We don’t adequately provide for the least among ourselves. There are good outcomes, but it’s not like these kids get cured.”

She received a call from a homeless shelter looking for someone with a medical background to care for a drug-addicted newborn. She took Emily’s older brother home first at 11 days old, with the understanding that he was not adoptable. Social workers told Speake that the boy would stay in her home only a month before entering a special drug-addiction rehab program with his mother.

“I would think he might be leaving any day, and as much as I wanted him to become mine, I tried not to get too bonded.” Speake’s emotions warred as months passed and the boy stayed in her home. “Some months there would be visits, and other times the mother’s drug test would come back ‘dirty’ and she couldn’t see him. It was a hard emotional time.” When his mother never completed rehab, Speake continued to care for him. “We ended up back in court and the state wanted to take him from me and put him in a two-parent home. We had already bonded. The Foster Care Review Board ultimately ruled that there was no guarantee that a two-parent home would stay a two-parent home.”

Foster Parenting vs. Adoption
Foster children often come from at-risk backgrounds, says Mike Hamblin, Utah Foster Care Foundation director of foster/adoptive family recruitment. “Children that are in foster care are typically there due to a background of abuse and neglect.” In Utah, there are 2,600 children in foster care and only 1,400 families providing care.

“Foster care is seen as almost a volunteer labor of love,” says Hamblin. “While there is a basic reimbursement for parents who care for children in foster care, it’s a fairly minimal amount,” requiring some foster parents to fork out their own money for their children to participate in extracurricular activities. On top of that, with the poor economy, the reimbursement rates paid to parents for providing foster care have been reduced each of the past two years.

At the hearing where the birth mother of Speake’s children ultimately relinquished the oldest boy, Speake recalls gazing at the birth mother, a pale dark-haired woman who sat alone with her attorney on the other side of the courtroom. “My heart went out to this woman who was never able to give up cocaine and heroin so that she could go into rehab.” After the hearing, “I just had to hug her. We hugged each other and both broke out sobbing,” Speake remembers. “It was like we were at a funeral—one of the most heart-wrenching things I have ever experienced.”

During December 1998, Speake received calls from DCFS, asking that since she had kept her foster license active, if she could foster Emily. Again, she was told that she wouldn’t have this baby long before the mother entered drug rehab. “They said that this time, there was a father involved and Dad would be getting to see the baby.” Emily’s birth parents visited her just twice in the first seven months. Because the birth mother never completed drug rehab, Emily remained with Speake. To her surprise, she received another call five years later about a third sibling, a son from the same mother, whom she also later adopted. “I feel that it was in God’s hands. I thought I wouldn’t get a baby. Now I have three, and I am trying to keep them together.”

She also thinks it points to the fact there aren’t enough homes or people willing to step forward and do this kind of thing. At the time she adopted her children, had another parent asked if they should adopt instead of remaining a foster parent, “back then, I would have told her to go for it. Now, knowing about the issues that have come up, I probably wouldn’t be so sure.”

She still has no idea how her and Emily’s futures will play out. “Other than the fact that she and the boys are safe, I don’t feel that we have made a lot of progress.” At the one parent meeting she was invited to attend on Feb. 8, Speake says no one could tell her who Emily’s teacher was or how her grades were or provide school pictures. Up until the e-mails she received on Feb. 16, “I’ve gotten no direction, no guidance and no plan for the kind of therapy for Emily.”

Speake recently met with a foster mom who has cared for a little girl, now 6, for several years. “She says that my experience is the reason why she won’t adopt this girl,” says Speake. “She can’t afford to lose all the help she is getting. Why will they give a foster mom all of this money and support—over $2,500 month—when they won’t give that to me? Isn’t the goal a permanent home?”

Sollis says it is unfortunate that there are families who won’t adopt strictly because they will lose foster-care payments. When Speake recently wrote a letter requesting a different foster home for her daughter, she expressed concern about Emily’s bed-wetting episodes in the foster home, possibly due to nocturnal seizures that Emily was known to have. “This is a safety issue and the fact that Emily doesn’t remember [why she wet the bed] is a red flag that she could be having seizures in her sleep, losing bladder control and then not remembering in the morning,” Speake explains. “I am fully aware, probably more than anyone, how difficult Emily’s behavior can be, but I feel her needs still need to be addressed and provided for.”

During almost every visit, Emily asks Speake, “Can you make them let me come home? Why can’t I come home?”

Would Speake want Emily to live at home again? “That’s a tough one,” Speake admits, “but if we could get the right help and it is safe—absolutely. My dream would be for her to get the help that she needs so that she can come back home and be a part of our family. That would be the family life I have always wanted,” she says.

Continue reading: Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Read All
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // March 22,2011 at 03:51

Hmmmm, so because you could not handle the choice you made, which was to adopt these kids, you blame the state for not providing help to you? Either im mistakened or your crying over the choice you made. Why adopt these kids if your going to point fingers at other people for the outcome of your choice?

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // March 22,2011 at 03:39

No good choice? Publishing this article was one BAD choice. Looks like this article caused more bad for the child. That's just sad.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // March 21,2011 at 19:00

Not alot of people can understand your situation Rusty, But there are those few that do. I truly think that unless you have lived it you truly wont understand it. Its people like that speak out about situations like this that make a difference for others.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // March 17,2011 at 20:08

When i read this article i could not believe a so called mother would allow for this article to be published. I have no clue what this "mother" was thinking! A mother is suppose to protect their child, how is this article protecting her at all? My kids go to the same school as this little girl on the pictures, today my kids told me that she cried in the bathroom at school today because the kids keep teasing her. I hope city weekly and this mother hold responsiblility for that. Protecting this child? Exactly how did you do that! Getting help for this child? This article did nothing but make matters worse for this child! It amazes me how far city weekly went for a story that brought this little girl down today. For her "mother",I am ashamed of you. What were you thinking! I am a mother of a problemed child and never would I give up my child at the moment my child needed me the most, and then to publish it to the public? I would be ashamed to call myself a mother if i were you! I hope mothers, REAL mothers reading this realize their role as a mother, and what not to do! RIDICULOUS I SAY!

 

Posted // March 21,2011 at 23:36 - I think, yes stand up for yourself, but do it another way without hurting your child. I'm pretty sure there are a lot of mothers who feel a child is too much, but not every kid is the easiest to deal with. Why would you blame the state for how your child is? They are not the parent, you are. Be a parent and find a way, don't just post an article on how things are not working. I'm pretty sure if every parent did that, the newspaper would turn into a 100 paged novel. There were other ways to go about this. You have got to look for them, other than just writing about it. Come on now.

 

MEL
Posted // March 20,2011 at 19:56 - All I'm saying is that this article put a sad effect on her daughter. Yes be mad at the state for whatever reasons you have, but to bring your daughter down as well is uncalled for. Her daughter was teased at school because of this article! The bottom line is this article was published with pictures and videos, which hurt this poor little girl. You keep talking of how this mother did so much for this little girl, but your missing the part of what this little girl is going through because of this article. You keep saying she's trying to love and help her child, exactly what was the outcome of this article for her daughter? Her daughter was called a murderer and lost friends due to the change of schools. She's still in foster care and all this article did was make her life harder than it already is. I thought the mother would publish this article to HELP her daughter, this article only brought her into tears. The outcome could have been prevented if the mother saw every angle this article would be taken for. The first angle being her daughter and the daughter's surroundings. Which should be every mother's intuition don't you think? Yes the mother has been through a lot, I'm sure almost every mom has. But a little girl at her age should not have gone through what she did, and it only happened because of her mother's decision to publish this. The only one who did the crying out loud, was her daughter from this article. Yes mother's sacrifice a lot for their kids, but what mother sacrifices her daughter's life that she was living at the moment, for her own personal need of a story? That is the other side you did not see nicole, was the effect it had on her daughter. Which should have been the only point that mattered from this article. Yours truly, MEL :)

 

Posted // March 20,2011 at 17:36 - Okay I don't know how many times I have pointed out that yes it was a mistake to put her picture on here. But I am not going to exchange nasty words with you anymore. If you would like to come to my house and talk about this in person and explain both sides of view, I would be glad to. You can then meet my 16 year old foster daughter (which I work for the same agency that this child is in as well) and my 8 year old daughter! I have not "come on here posting" things that are not true. Everything I have said is the truth (well maybe except the part about you sending the article to school with your child). To end this ... you keep talking about me understanding both sides of the story ... well I have them. It is sad all the way around that this child fell through the cracks of our "great" system. One last question, if this same thing was happening to a child with cancer or some other disease, and the state was not willing to help, would you be saying what a horrible mother she is, or would you be saying, "that poor lady, look what she is having to deal with for having the heart to adopt 3 special needs children and now no one will help with the situation?" But because it is a mental illness, people look down at her for not being able to provide the absolute best for her. I mean for crying out loud, she moved states just to get her the best neurological care she could get ... and that is not total commitment and love to you? Yours truly, Idiot, stupid, shallow Nicole :)

 

MEL
Posted // March 20,2011 at 16:54 - The pictures are included in the article, therefore makes the WHOLE ARTICLE WRONG! Whether it be a little or big part of the article it is wrong.It made her daughter cry and that's that! A mother should not do that whether trying to prove her point or not, try it another way without hurting your children! But she obviously didn't think it clearly which makes this all just sad. They called a little girl at school a murderer, does that really not set off any flags to you? Really Nicole? My kids play willh this little girl and she is a sweet little girl. I know all the children that my kids play with, and I am aware that she is foster care. But if you were really a foster mom you would know there more possibilities than just being her teacher or a therapist of talking with her. You obviously haven't spoken with this little girl lately. Yes I know she changed schools, doesn't mean my kids didn't see her crying at school.Now you are really the "sketchy" one here, saying you are things you really are not. Get the story from BOTH sides nicole, instead of just agreeing with the little knowledge that you have. Don't come on here and post when you really don't know what your talking about.

 

Posted // March 20,2011 at 08:50 - This mother did not GIVE up her child. She did not say, "Oh today I don't want her anymore so I think I will drop her off at the state." No, since she started school she had been trying to get help, and the state WOULD NOT help her because she had legally adopted her and the services she needed were NOT under the post adoption services. She had no other choice but to protect the other two children in the house. She also did not just turn her over and say, "Hey today I am going to have an article written about our story ... she STILL was fighting for her daughter, trying to get her help, also paying child support to the state, AND seeing her daughter as much as possible. She in no way gave up on her. Maybe she did make a mistake by letting them put the pictures on here, but YES that was the only thing wrong with the article. If not for the pictures, they did not use her real name, so it would have never been brought back to her. Since this story, other families have come forward with similar issues and also some advocating agencies for children. So this article DID HELP! It is upsetting that the girl was upset, but I want to know how you personally met with this girl, because right as this happened she was taken away from the classes and had to be picked up. So unless you are a teacher or therapist at the school, you would have not had contact with her??? Maybe the school should be asked why they were letting unknown "parents" talk with her without the guardians permission! (Which I personally don't think happened) Sketchy!!!

 

Posted // March 20,2011 at 02:43 - Heard they called this little girl a " murderer" at her school. I would be upset at my mother if this happened to me, I see that. Should have thought this out clearly before publishing this.

 

Posted // March 20,2011 at 02:37 - I think the mother did a good job on attacking the state and foster agency. But also hurt her daughter, wrong of her to put her daughter down like that. That's just sad. Should have done that a different way than this.

 

MEL
Posted // March 20,2011 at 02:19 - Excuse me nicole the idiot! You know this family personally, and you think it was right to publish this? THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT HER DAUGHTER AND IT DID NOTHING FOR HER, BUT HURT HER MORE! Her mother put her in foster care, and tells everyone on the city weekly ( a free public newspaper) that her daughter tried to kill her brothers, What mother does that! Obviously one like you, who wasn't thinking of her daughter's life that she was having at the moment and the affect on her from it! No only idiot mothers like you! Yes taking care of a problem child can be hard at times, but you don't BLAST their business all over a public newspaper, and all for to what? Stand up against the state? You would do that to your child? Really? And you called me shallow? IDIOT YOU ARE INDEED! No nicole, I did not give my children the city weekly and I never will. But I'm pretty sure that the kids from the school saw their classmate on THE FRONT PAGE and asked why? That's what most likely happened OBVIOUSLY! Are you really that stupid nicole? I think so. This could have been prevented from the beginning, by not publishing this in the first place! You say the only thing wrong with this article was posting the picture? Are serious? IT MADE A LITTLE GIRL CRY! So unless you do that on a daily basis, it is wrong! No mother should cause that for a daughter especially if the mother gave her up to the state! She doesn't even live with her anymore, and caused her daughter pain! I went to tell this little girl that she is still welcomed from my family and you know what she tells me? That her "mom is stupid and knows what really happened with her brothers is NOT TRUE!" She tells me that her mother told her "the lady who wrote the article will post whatever she needs to sell the story." But you wouldn't know that right? Cause your just a family friend that only hears one side of the story! Now that is shallow nicole! Shallow like the idiot you are.

 

Posted // March 18,2011 at 15:39 - Wow Mel! Sounds to me like you are the ridiculous one. I know this family personally too, and I feel the mother had no other choice. She could not get any help from anyone, and I am sure it is happening with many other families as well. She wanted to shed light on the situation so that it doesn't happen to others. I praise her for having the balls to stand up to the state and the foster care agency when they "encouraged" her not to come forward with the story. Now she is getting blame??? Wow you are really shallow. I have a mentally disabled daughter in my home as well, and some times I have wondered if I could keep her here as I worry for the safety of others. BUT, I have the help from the state in these situations as I am a foster parent. Yes, I understand it wasn't the best interest to publish her picture, but that was the ONLY misstep in this article. The best part of your response was when you said, "I am ashamed of you ... What were you thinking?" SHE WAS THINKING OF THE SAFETY OF HER TWO OTHER BOYS! Yes the daughter was crying as kids were teasing her about her picture being on the "front page" of a magazine that their parents read, but they DID NOT know why she was on there or even what it was about. I am also ashamed of the "parent" that LET their child bring "City Weekly" to school to tease this child about it. Oh my bad, it was probably you! To end it, I am ashamed of you as a mother to not understand the difficulty that this woman was faced with and the compassion to understand how turned around their lives have been since last year.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // March 11,2011 at 15:51

I'm not sure I understand why the City Weekly is protecting "Emily's" name, but showing her face. How is that protecting her? Why even bother changing her name?

 

Posted // March 15,2011 at 11:35 - Has the birth mother ever been charged with anything regarding child endangerment? she was obviously actively using whilst pregnant three different times. if she is so inclined to shoot up, why not shoot up some depo-provera along with her drugs. she should do some serious time for having children be born with such awful circumstances that could easily be prevented.

 

Posted // March 11,2011 at 20:52 - If Ms. Speake has abandoned Emily to the custody of the state, how can she give permission for anything involving this child?

 

Posted // March 11,2011 at 19:22 - Emily's mother gave us permission to publish the girl's name, photo and video image. We chose not to publish her given name. At some point, we may consider removing the photos/videos from our online archives. But for now, the images of Emily and Rusty are compelling and help readers grasp this family's unique challenges.

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close