citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page

Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Cover Story /  Deportation Factory Page 1
Cover Story

Deportation Factory Page 1

In immigration court, few find second chances

By Stephen Dark
Posted // February 1,2012 -

When Maria Magdalena Oseguera woke up her son Ramiro and told him officers were asking for him at the front door of her Roy home, he didn’t want to see them. Maria told 37-year-old Ramiro he should speak to the men. Neither she nor her son knew what the initials ICE on their shirts meant.

“She always wanted us to respect the law,” says her daughter Mercedes. “Now she feels very guilty. She knows she just turned him over to the wolves.”

Before Immigration and Customs Enforcement came knocking at 6 a.m. on Sept. 29, 2010, the Oseguera family was the embodiment of the immigrant American dream. Ramiro Oseguera Sr. had brought his wife and five children, including Ramiro Jr., then 5, from Michoacán to the United States in 1978.

His daughters remember how bright the stars were in the early summer mornings when they picked cherries in Utah orchards for local farms. When the children were older, the family worked the onion fields after school, back-breaking migrant labor Ramiro Jr. says he was ashamed of as a child. But their father, Mercedes says, “was teaching us how to work with our hands, to understand that there was always some way to earn money.”

16_6.jpg

In 1984, deportation cast its first shadow over the lives of the family, when the eldest son, Jesus, was picked up on a traffic violation. He agreed to self-deport, but first married his American-citizen girlfriend in a Magna Catholic church, before taking her on a honeymoon to Mazatlán. He had planned to apply for a green card from Michoacán, but while driving in their car on a narrow mountain pass, he and his wife were crushed to death by a large trailer. One week later, their coffins lay in the church where they had just been married.

The family became naturalized citizens in 1987, thanks to President Ronald Reagan’s amnesty law. All, that is, but Ramiro, who, being an apathetic teen, elected to become a legal permanent resident two years later instead. “I didn’t know the consequences of not being a citizen,” he said during a jailhouse interview.

Ramiro’s three sisters all graduated from college and pursued careers—one is now a corporate-training manager, another is a clinical-development analyst. Ramiro struggled with alcohol, depression and prescription drugs, but still managed to graduate from Weber State University in 2006 with a Bachelor in Fine Arts. However, a 2002 third-degree felony conviction for theft, which he successfully got reduced in 2010 to a class A misdemeanor, not only hampered his searches for work, but, the family say, ultimately led ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations [ERO] agents to his door.

When a sobbing Maria Magdalena called her daughters to tell them that Ramiro had been arrested by immigration, “I remember hearing her cry in exactly the same way,” as the day they learned Jesus had died, Mercedes says. “She felt like she was losing another son.”

Held in Spanish Fork jail for 18 months while his family spent $23,000 fighting his case through the courts, Ramiro said his feelings the day ERO handcuffed him were equally bleak. “It felt like I was being picked up by the Gestapo, that I had no rights whatsoever.”

THE RETURN OF JIM CROW
In the complex and ever-changing labyrinth of federal immigration law, there is no statute of limitations on crimes that individuals have committed, been convicted of and served their time for. Even decades later, they can be used by Homeland Security attorneys to justify deportations. It is just one of the many dark, toxic elements that fuel the deportation machine that, under President Barack Obama, has reached unprecedented proportions, with 400,000 expelled each year. “The only people to blame for all these people being deported is U.S. Congress,” says well-respected immigration attorney Leonor Perretta, liaison between the court and members of the Utah Chapter of the Association of Immigration Lawyers of America [AILA]. “Each immigrant has parents, spouse, children, an employer, a church and a community that also suffers the consequences of their deportation. I think Congress needs to look at this bigger picture.”

The local consequences of the federal government’s failure to find a solution to broken immigration policies are visible in a building west of Redwood Road, guarded by a sinister black metal fence. Little wonder that when clients of outspoken immigration attorney Aaron Tarin’s finally find the imposing building, they refuse to go near it until he’s there. “It looks like a jail,” he says.

No words identify what the building is or what it houses. Along with Atlanta and Omaha, it’s one of only three immigration courts nationwide that are located in commercial facilities with ICE. That collocation underscores a long-held perception among some critics that Salt Lake City’s immigration court is tantamount to a deportation assembly line.

The Executive Office of Immigration Review [EOIR], based in Washington, D.C., oversees the courts. According to EOIR figures City Weekly received in response to a records request, between 2009 and 2011, Salt Lake City’s immigration judges, William L. Nixon and Dustin B. Pead, decided the fate of 8,098 people. They allowed 407 to stay, terminated 278 cases because the state couldn’t prove its allegations, and deported 7,383, the vast majority of whom were Mexican. Tarin says these figures demonstrate how brutal the odds are against the immigrant.

Randy Neal was a Salt Lake City ICE prosecutor for 18 months until 2010, when he became an Idaho-based defense attorney. He cautions that the statistics don’t automatically mean the judges are harsh. “I think it reflects a law which is harsh. A significant number of defense cases are weak, usually as a matter of merit on their specific individual facts, but sometimes because of a lack of, or weak, representation.”

16_5.jpg

Immigration court is an intimate universe all of its own, akin, as one West Coast immigration judge put it, to “holding death-penalty cases in traffic court.” With a choking workload of 1,173 cases pending, extraordinary dramas play out there every day. But even as a core group of 15 immigration attorneys—some of whom served Spanish-speaking missions for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in South American countries—fight to keep families together, ERO agents—some also with Spanish-language missionary work in their background—work the jails and, less frequently, the streets. “We have a vested interest in keeping Utah safe,” an agent told KSL TV.

Whichever side of the immigration court you are on, Neal says, “You can’t be human and not see the terrible effects that are going on. It all comes down to where people were born. There’s no fairness in that, it’s just such a random thing.”

Ramiro knows that firsthand. “I’m an American,” he says, “I’ve lived here since I was 5.” He and other legal permanent residents with misdemeanors or felonies in their past (three of whom agreed to tell their story to City Weekly) tend to be the only detainees who fight deportation, Ramiro says. Most unauthorized aliens, attorneys say, lack resources to hire counsel, and break under the pressures of incarceration, signing away their rights to get out from behind bars.

In this court of second chances—one that is supposedly civil rather than criminal—legal counsel and constitutional rights for the jumpsuited, manacled detainees are in short supply. Some attorneys complain that ICE’s ERO agents are targeting the low-hanging fruit of aliens with minor violations, despite recent government memos to ease off the deportation throttle. Tarin argues that what occurs at 2975 Decker Lane forms part of a larger nationwide stain. He and his Nigerian-born, veteran-attorney partner, Hakeem Ishola, insist immigrants’ rights is the new civil-rights struggle.

“We believe in 60 years [the time it took to end segregation in American schools], we will look back at the way immigrants and their families were rounded up and treated for civil infractions, and see this as a dark time in our history,” Tarin says.

Continue reading: Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Read All
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // February 7,2012 at 14:56

I work for an immigration attorney and working here as well as being a legal immigrant to this country I fully understand how hard it is to do the "right thing" from the beginning and enter the country legally. I think there is a lack of unerstanding about the immigrants plight as they stand on the outside looking in. Many poeple would rather come legally if they could- it saves them a lot of embarrassment, harrassment and fear. But most people don't know where to begin, they simply don't have the resources, economically and otherwise to immigrate the right way. I believe that on a humanitarian grounds America should make it easier for people to come to America. Currently America has helped fund several civil wars in central and south America and American's continue to fund the drug wars in Mexico and Central America by being the biggest consumers of narcotics in the world. I harbor no ill will toward this great nation but the iorny of this whole situation is not lost on me. I think that a lot of the comments here speak volumes to the ignorance that American's have about their own immigration system. you don't think so? Ever heard of the INA? probably not. Do you know the difference between an H1 visa and an H2B visa? The difference between removal and voluntary departure? how about Prosecutorial Discretion? What in the world is that. I'm a forgeiner and I know more about American immigration laws than about 90% of Americans. Any how I have a feeling that American's won't change their views any time soon and likewise immigrants won't stop comming over any time soon. Just beause you look away doesn't mean the truth isn't there.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // February 3,2012 at 18:33

I've joined the Salt Lake City Prison Divestment Campaign.   you can too -

Search Salt-Lake-City-Prison-Divestment-Campaign at Facebook

 

 

Posted // February 6,2012 at 10:14 - Yeah, yeah, Mr. Activist-on-the-spot. Go on back to the free speech zone and smoke another one, ye parasitic hobo.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // February 1,2012 at 20:43

The (erroneous) assumptions made in the above two comments clearly demonstrate the prejudice and bias that exists against immigrants in our society.  Why is it automatically assumed that all immigrants gained access into this country illegally?  That is not always the case.  Your prejudiced remarks reveal your ignorance and clearly demonstrate that “sympathy is in short supply.”  That is what is at the very core of this issue and why these “deportation factories” exist.  There is an absence of humanity, of civility in the entire system and its processes.  As for judging and questioning the integrity and character of a mother based on the actions of her child – that again, reveals ignorance.  God forbid that a parent’s character and integrity be judged based on he actions of a rebellious child, rather than their own actions and the lives they, themselves, live.  It’s easy to judge others from the safety of our own, narrow, ethnocentric points of view.  I doubt that any of these immigrants want your “sympathy,” but a bit of empathy would go a long way on ALL levels, not just the immigration debate.  And yes, there is a difference between the two… look it up.  It’s unfortunate that the very article that was meant to bring awareness to the apathy and inhumanity that fuel these “deportation factories” is actually serving to perpetuate it…

 

Posted // February 3,2012 at 14:28 - Mea, I can't answer for 'bsm,' but could you please use your eyes AND your brain and go back and ready my post? You say a lot of really ignorant things about my comments that don't make any sense given THE GODDAM FACTS I LAID OUT FOR YOU! My 'prejudiced remarks?'Which ones, genius? I said nothing about the character of the mother. And I began by outlining what 'legal' immigration looks like because my grandparents came here legally. As far as your additionally ignorant comment,"It%u2019s easy to judge others from the safety of our own, narrow, ethnocentric points of view," you need to get a reality grip. It's easy for me with 60 years of street smarts to say that if you don't want to meet cops, jails, courts, judges, incompetent public defenders, sentences, deportation, don't fuck up. It's a simple rule that we ALL live by. And Mea, try sneaking into Mexico sometime. And if you want to get seriously fucked up, commit crime while you're there. The people you're so concerned about have been treated with kid gloves here compares to the way you or I would be treated sneaking into Mexico. Your family would never hear from you again. If you're lucky, it might come quickly and painlessly, and only after your family paid a ransom.

 

Posted // February 2,2012 at 09:10 - Actually, it was stated within the first two or three paragraphs that the immigrants outlined in the story came to the USA illegally and naturalized, thanks to amnesty, a decade or so later. So perhaps it is you that is doing the assuming here? I didn't even read the story and I saw that much. Maybe you should read beyond the headline before attacking people for their opinions, which seem more informed at this point than yours.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // February 1,2012 at 16:33

“She always wanted us to respect the law,” says her daughter Mercedes. “Now she feels very guilty. She knows she just turned him over to the wolves.”   If that was the case, there would never had been illegal entry to this country in the first place, nor would there have been a 2nd degree felony conviction (that was reduced to a misdemeanor). 

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // February 1,2012 at 15:06

I hate hearing these stories, but as the grandson of immigrants who came down a gangplank at Ellis Island with their names safety-pinned to their lapels, a place to live and work already arranged and sponsored and letters of endorsement from village elders and from awaiting friends and relatives in America. No one sneaked in. My sympathy is in short supply. I get that these young people didn't ask to be brought here, particularly illegally, but I also noticed the extensive criminal behavior patterns that seem totally out of place for a someone who's trying to keep a low profile. 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close