citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page
Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Cover Story /  Neighborhood Watched Page 2
Cover Story

Neighborhood Watched Page 2

Saratoga Springs residents tread lightly to avoid the long arm of the law.

By Stephen Dark
Posted // March 2,2011 -

WymanUse.jpgMAN ABOUT TOWN
Craig Wayman grew up on a farm in Payson, Utah. His parents bought 150 acres in what became Saratoga Springs in 1980, with leasing options on another 300 acres. They cleared out the land, irrigated it and planted apple, cherry, peach and apricot trees. Saratoga Springs was incorporated in 1997. His father, Reid Wayman, was on the original city council and was, his son says, “instrumental in the development of the city.” In August 2010, Councilman Cecil Tuley proposed naming a park after the Wayman family, but as yet, the park remains without a title.

His marital life has not been easy. His first wife, Monica, rolled the car the day they were driving to Las Vegas to get married when they were 18. She was paralyzed from the waist down and gets around in a wheelchair. After 10 years, they divorced. “As far as I’m concerned, he’s an amazing man,” she says.

Wayman was married for a second time for three years, a relationship that also ended in a divorce, one that Wayman characterizes as non-acrimonious.

Wayman met his third wife, Melinda Bird, at an Impact training personal development course, in 2003. The second day of their honeymoon in Machu Picchu, Peru, he says she left him for the day, announcing she wanted to be alone. “I realized things weren’t quite as they appeared,” he says. They had two children together but separated in 2007. On July 24, 2008, when Wayman went to pick up his two sons, then ages 1 and 2, he and Bird got into a fight. She filed a police report alleging he spit at her, grabbed her by the arm and shoved her down. Wayman says during an argument she grabbed him by the testicles, which made him “reactively spit,” and he then set her down on the ground before fleeing. A week later, Bird gave the Saratoga Springs Police Department photographs downloaded from her cell that showed a bruise on her leg and marks on her arm, with handwritten dates on them.

On August 20, 2008, Commissioner Thomas Patton in 4th District Court denied Bird’s petition for a protective order. But that would not be the end of Wayman’s legal entanglements. He learned from Bird that SSPD was going to file charges against him. Wayman spoke to SSPD Detective Bruce Champagne, who, unbeknownst to Wayman, was a former neighbor of his, living just a few doors down from the home Wayman had moved out of when he separated from Bird, and also socialized with Wayman’s mother every Sunday in the local ward house. Champagne, a former West Valley City Police officer, was both lead detective on the case and also case manager through Wayman’s trials. He would later testify to Stoney and several 4th District court juries that he felt Wayman was trying to influence his decision over filing charges by informing him of his status in the town. Wayman says he simply wanted Champagne to do his job and investigate his side of the story, something he believes the officer never did.

Becky Pirente is also a neighbor of Champagne’s and a friend of Wayman’s who helped mediate between him and Bird. In a signed statement regarding a summer 2009 conversation Pirente had with Champagne, Pirente claimed Champagne wanted Wayman “to accept the charges filed against him and warned that ‘they’ had more to charge him with if he were to persist” resisting the charges. Anything Wayman did to fight the charges would mean that the judicial system “would come back at Craig ten times harder.” Champagne told Pirente he believed Wayman was an abuser. Regardless of any extenuating circumstances, Champagne told his neighbor, “As the man of the house, Craig should have been able to control the situation.” Champagne told Pirente that Wayman was, “the most corrupt, dishonest and manipulative individual he had ever encountered.”

Wayman was charged with two class B misdemeanors, assault and domestic violence but missed his court date for trial before Stoney. When he went down to city hall—at Champagne’s suggestion, he says—to resolve the problem the following day, he was arrested and released on $10,000 bail.

SLAP FOR SLAP
When he takes the bench in Saratoga Springs every other Friday, justice court Judge Stoney has been known to say, “In my real life, I am a judge in West Valley City.” Stoney shares the bench with Judge Brendan McCullough. Kent Hart, executive director of the Utah Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, finds the contrast between the two judges instructive. “Although both are former prosecutors, Judge McCullough is more fair-minded and reasonable,” Hart says. “He is able to put himself in the defendant’s and defense attorney’s shoes and impose fair and effective sentences. Judge Stoney’s demeanor and decisions are more visceral and harsh, which reflects his punitive view of the world even when reason and cost-effectiveness suggest more compassion and deliberation.”

On Jan. 1, 2008, Saratoga Springs Justice Court opened its doors. Lindsay Jarvis, who had prosecuted cases before Stoney in West Valley City for a year, was its prosecutor. Saratoga residents, Stoney says, “with few exceptions, are very polite and willing to accept responsibility for their mistakes, pay their fines and get on with life.”

Wayman hadn’t done himself any favors with Stoney when, on Oct. 15, 2008, he requested a continuance and contrasted “the judge’s history and this case.” Wayman was alluding to the fact that in 1995, Stoney’s own ex-wife had made domestic-violence allegations at Stoney shortly after he was made a pro-tem 3rd District Court judge. Stoney resigned his appointment and returned to his position as a West Valley City prosecutor.

Stoney says Wayman’s past comments “had nothing to do with my decision-making process in his case.”

On Nov. 21, 2008, Wayman appeared pro se before Judge Stoney. Bird’s allegations had expanded from the original police report to include being verbally abused and kicked while on the ground by Wayman.

When his first wife, Monica, testified about Wayman’s character, Jarvis asked her if Wayman had abused her. She recalled an incident when they were 18 when Craig Wayman slapped her. Stoney, in his judicial order, characterized the slap as abuse. Monica Wayman, however, says, “If it came across that way to Judge Stoney, that was totally not the case.” She described the incident as “not an anger moment,” but rather about trust. “In 30 years, he’s never once shown aggression. I trust him with my life and my kids,” she says now.

Stoney found Craig Wayman guilty of the abuse charges against his third wife, Melinda Bird. Wayman requested he be sentenced immediately, but the judge sent him to jail with no bail pending sentencing on Jan. 9, 2009, leaving him no opportunity to get his affairs in order. This was because Wayman had failed to comply with a Oct. 24, 2008, protective order for, among several other violations, sending Bird a text calling her “a two-bit whore” in the early hours of the morning after he drove by their former home and saw a car in the driveway. Wayman says while the text was ill advised, it occurred on Oct. 11, when there was no protective order in place.

“The most disturbing thing was I had no idea when I was getting out,” Wayman says. “I’d get my hopes up, then be rejected.” His mind constantly processed the events. “I’d wake up at night and think of the insanity of it.”

Becky Pirente attended one of Wayman’s Saratoga Springs court hearings where Wayman was brought in an orange jumpsuit, handcuffed and manacled. Stoney, she says, “behaved in a quite unprofessional fashion.” Stoney was upset about Wayman investigating the judge’s past online, notably allegations of domestic violence. Pirente says Stoney took it very personally. “He seemed outraged anyone would question his standing. He went on quite a while, berating Craig as a defendant, while defending his record as a judge.”

Wayman’s attorney, Larry Larsen, filed several unsuccessful motions attempting to get him out. Stoney declined to release him, however, and eventually sentenced Wayman to 60 days in jail. Wayman was also charged, while in jail, with one felony count of stalking, which included the supposed text violation. The stalking charge was heard by a jury in Judge Samuel McVey’s 4th District courtroom on June 2, 2009, where he was found guilty.

When Wayman stood to be sentenced, he couldn’t contain his anger and frustration. “I get you want to hear me be apologetic,” he told McVey, but “I’m sorry, I can’t do that. These charges are so drummed up and so fabricated.” Wayman noted that Bird had made similar allegations against previous husbands. After Wayman’s outburst, McVey told him he was tripling the sentence, and he was going to give him to 60 days in jail and three years probation.

Eight days before he was to be released, Wayman was in court again, for a review of his appeal of his domestic-violence convictions. Before a judge unfamiliar with the case, Saratoga Prosecutor Jarvis brought up new, startling allegations. Wayman, she told the judge, “is attempting to hire someone to kill Detective Champagne,” she said, “and actually made threats against me,” noting the source was an unnamed former Wayman employee. Utah County, she added, “is currently investigating that as we speak.” This may have come as a surprise to Utah County. Both Wayman and his current attorney, Greg Stewart, separately inquired at Utah County about the investigation. Stewart says, “The prosecutors’ clerks and the investigator’s office had no record of any [such] investigation.”

Nevertheless, with such dark rumblings in the background, the judge found “there’s a very definite pattern here of [Wayman] being an aggressor, and the same victim being subjected to this time and time again,” he said. He ordered a $50,000 cash-only bail, put both Champagne and Jarvis on the protective order, and ordered Wayman to stay out of Saratoga Springs, until Wayman’s lawyer pointed out he lived there. The high bail meant Wayman says he spent another 38 days behind bars, over and above the 60 days he received from McVey.

Continue reading: Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Read All
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // June 7,2011 at 13:12

I dated Craig for almost three years. He was abusive to me and my children, too. I believe his former wife is telling the truth.

 

Posted // June 16,2011 at 08:37 - For the record, Michael Brown, is Britney Champagne, who is the daughter of det. Bruce Champagne. Other aliases, Brandon, Her own acknowledged, Britney, and now Michael. Funny how if you read her comments in earlier posts, she eludes to having information which she wants to post, her twisted ego won't allow her to just walk away, from what has the potential to be some pretty serious charges against her, and in fact will be very damaging to her fathers up coming POST investigation. this information is all from the investigation that bruce champagne put together, entirely based on the say so of my ex-wife, yes the one who was just recently admitted by a judge to a long term mental health facility. reality is many of her statements are incorrect, I will leave this to the investigator to sort through. this young lady, is a product of her up bringing, based on what I know to be realities about her fathers character, or rather lack of, it would be nothing short of insanity to expect her to turn out even half way normal. The young lady, becky brooks, who miss champagne chose to slander by falsely representing to be her, brings to mind a similar situation I dealt with several years ago. It would seem her ex. husbands new wife, who just happened to be a case worker for the state of utah, took it upon herself to do some very similar stunts to what miss. champagne is now doing. she was exposed, arrested, and fired by the state, and yes charged. Her name was Leiah Summers, miss champagne, you might have your daddy pull the case. Just because your daddy says it's so, doesn't particularly make it a reality. Britney you want to keep playing this game, be assured there will be a price to pay.

 

Posted // June 16,2011 at 06:19 - Craig, what exactly are you denying? Do you deny that it was your reckless driving that killed your son Jeremy and parlyzed your wife Monica? Do you deny ever slapping Monica? Do you deny not paying support forcing Monica on welfare and Kelly and Jesse on Medicaid? Do you deny that the state of Utah had to go after you for the back support they paid for your children? Do you deny that you have had previous run ins with the law? Do you deny ever spitting on Melinda? We all have to grow up and accept our faults eventually, including you.

 

Posted // June 14,2011 at 20:31 - wow miss champagne, Britney, It would appear your on one of your rantings again. You do realize your setting yourself up for some pretty serious charges, with this slander, and defamation of character. Ms. Thomas, Rhonda will also attest to the falseness of this posting. wow, you folks are to much, I'm going to enjoy seeing the outcome of a certain Post complaint.

 

Posted // June 14,2011 at 10:19 - I HAVE SIT BACK AND STAYED SILENT. BUT CRAIG PLAYING THE VICTIM IS JUST TO MUCH FOR ME. I AM HIS SECOND WIFE AND ALSO A VICTIM OF HIS ABUSE. AND I REMENBER THINGS DIFFERENTLY. I REMEBER THAT HE WAS THE ONE DRIVING HIS FOUR WHEEL DRIVE WITH MONICA ON THE WAY TO GET MARRIED IN VEGAS. SHE WAS SIXTEEN AND PREGNANT. THEIR BABY DIED AS A RESULT OF THIS CRASH AND SHE WAS PARALYZED. AFTER THEY DIVORCED HE REFUSED TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT RESULTING IN HER GOING ON WELFARE AND KELLI AND JESSE BEING ON MEDICAID. HE WAS ALWAYS IN TROUBLE WITH THE LAW IN SOME FORM OR FASHION. WE DIVORCED AFTER LESS THAN TWO YEARS OF MARRIAGE DUE TO HIS EMOTIONAL AND PHYSICAL ABUSE. HE HAD SEVERAL LIVE IN GIRLFRIENDS WHO ALL SAID THE SAME THING. AND NOW WIFE NUMBER THREE IS TELLING THE SAME STORY. PLEASE PEOPLE WAKE UP AND HEAR US!

 

Posted // June 11,2011 at 18:17 - This is pretty pathetic , Becky Brooks, did not write that comment, i have a written statement from her saying she did not. Reality is, this is the Champagne's at it again. This man and his families willingness to try to sway public opinion, and plant a seed of doubt by posting anonymous, and using false names, is truly sick. These people have something wrong with them. Will be adding this to my POST complaint, Bruce. This is how they do it in Saratoga Springs, standard procedure. If you can't get a legitimate conviction, then create evidence to assure it.....

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // May 19,2011 at 11:30 I live in SS and have never had a problem with the police dept. How about everyone just follow the laws and then you won't have to worry about it. Ya, ya, I've read..that's not the point of the article...its about citizen's rights. Well, if you have nothing to hide, why not just let the police in your house on your own free will? Seems like NOT letting them in without a warrant is cause enough for them to be alarmed!

 

Posted // May 19,2011 at 21:04 - Why don't we all just go to jail with no charges, no crime committed, just so that Stoney gets his jollies.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // March 10,2011 at 16:29

I ask everyone that reads the comments to post on facebook,myspace,etc.lets make a push for the right direction

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // March 8,2011 at 22:41

You should only respect law enforcement, if they are respectable. I'm the first to acknowledge those officers who do their job with integrity, and honesty. We know what kind of crap an individual takes in this city if they stand up to the nonsense, but patience, it takes time. Would seem my claims had merit, based on four not guilty verdicts, and a Judge granting me sole custody of my boys.

 

Posted // March 26,2011 at 08:26 - Brandon, Britney, You give new meaning to the word ignorance, but then considering that your father is det. Bruce Champagne, it would explain that. No I am not a police hater, but good try, this would be standard procedure with your father, to attempt to sway public opinion, as well as his coworkers. Would seem most of them are wise to his tactics, would also explain officer Rosens legal actions at the moment with this P.D. As to my wife being terrified of me, would seem she has dropped protective order, as well as her family is seeking to get her help for her mental health issues. This whole stupid situation is because det. Champagne didn't have enough sense to look into the facts a little closer, then stooped to creating his own. Wow, you are unbelievable, and you want to blow it off as a joke, I don't think so. You people are seriously disturbed...

 

Posted // March 10,2011 at 23:53 - I have not once heard you say anything decent about police officers. To me you come off as somewhat of a "cop hater" in fact. From what I have heard you were not granted custody of your boys because you are considered a law abiding citizen, your wife was terrified of you and extremely concerned for her safety. She handed them over because it was the only way to be rid of you. You lucked out on 4 charges but do you mind me asking how may other charges there are that you were not as lucky with?

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // March 7,2011 at 19:47

Again well said Black Mumba... The young man admitted he missed his court date and didnt take care of his warrant because he had lost his job. If he had notified the court immediately after his court date and asked to appear before the Judge he could have asked for another way to go about his fines like work diversion or something of the sort so the warrant could be cleared. If you are on probation you do give up certain rights and I am sure the young man was completely aware of those. They go over all of that when you are out on probation in detail! You also sign a paper stating you understand I believe. Everyone is so concerned about their rights but no one seems to care about consequences? Consequences are beneficial and it truly sucks, for lack of a better term, to be the person deserving of them but we learn at a young age, well at least my siblings and I did, that you accept them, learn from them and move on!

Where are all the supposed police men who have resigned? Why are they not stepping up and standing up for "our" civil rights with the rest of you? It would be nice to hear what they say.

Jessica, you are saying B.M. is the one passing judgments but it just seems so much like you and your fan club are doing just as much judging! I guess I didn't realize a person could personally know each and every person on the SSPD. You "smear" all of them daily.

Craig, in your response to B.M. you tried to distort what they had said? Hypocritical much? You know very well that was not what was implied. Oh,haha I almost forgot... Light back at ya sport! :)

Let me just say I have really enjoyed reading B.M.'s responses and I have a high respect for the things this person has said. Seems like a very unbiased point of view. This person has been on both ends and yet is a better person because of it and has such a great outlook on things! That is a person who should be proud of who they are, the ability to overcome trials life throws at us, and the strength to accept what they have done and not place blame on others.

You should respect those willing to take on a career like law enforcement. Not everyone can hold a position like that. It is dangerous and time consuming and it would be hard to come home every day after seeing homocides, child abuse and so forth, and expect to still enjoy a normal evening not thinking about such tragic things.

As for the Judge, and his alleged wife abuse accusations; still no proof and were they not dismissed? From what I hear he was going through somewhat of a messy divorce which is quite common. Women make such wild claims to gain custody of the kids and Craig, were you not stating that almost very same defense? Again, hypocritical.