“WERE YOU SCARED?”
Jared Nichols’ South Jordan personnel file boasts commendations and letters of recommendation for his dedication to his work. He emerges as an assertive, tenacious officer, valued by South Jordan, according to one commendation, for his experience and knowledge dealing with gangs gleaned from an assignment to the Metro Gang Task Force. Nichols’ “proactive patrolling,” as a superior describes his approach to policing, extends to chasing down an unarmed juvenile Nichols later wrote had been involved “in causing mischief,” with his “duty weapon draw[n] and at low ready.” He also can display a temper. In November 2009, Nichols received a written warning for insubordination after he yelled at Crist following a training session. The warning noted “the current climate” between the sergeant and the officer, although whether that referred to Crist not backing him up while pursuing Pennington is unclear.
One past event not included in the personnel file Pennington’s family received through a records request was Nichols’ involvement in a prior shooting. Prisbey only knew Nichols had shot someone else while on duty because Perez mentioned in his interview with investigators that Nichols had just finished “initiating,” which Prisbey correctly surmised referred to a prior shooting Nichols had been involved in.
Twenty months before Pennington’s death, on July 14, 2007, Nichols and a second officer fatally shot white supremacist Darren Neil Greuber at an apartment complex on 5601 S. Redwood Road. At that time, Nichols was on assignment with the Metro Gang Unit. He had gone with a team of 11 officers, some members of Taylorsville’s SWAT team, to arrest Greuber as “a favor,” to a Taylorsville officer also assigned to the gang unit, according to Taylorsville Police Department documents. When the unarmed Greuber tried to escape by ramming his car against numerous parked cars, two officers, one of them Nichols, shot him.
Prisbey alleges the shooting-investigation team, which included Sgt. Leary of the District Attorney’s Office, failed to address key questions, the most important being a witness who claimed that someone shouted, “He’s got a gun, he’s got a gun.” In a situation such as the arrest of a man records show officers suspected was armed, those words would surely have been Greuber’s death warrant. Nowhere in the reports of interviews with the two officers, however, was that witness’ statement addressed.
A few hours after Pennington’s shooting, Leary and West Jordan Sgt. Travis Rees interviewed Perez. Two days later, they talked to Nichols. Nichols told the investigators that prior to the interview, he and his wife had been taken to dinner by his lieutenant, and Nichols had requested and been given a copy of his dashcam video to study.
Prisbey believes such stark collaboration with someone who is essentially a criminal suspect still pales, however, beside the lack of questions posed by investigators. Family members claim investigators did not ask Nichols why parts of his dashcam video had no audio; why, if he claimed he did not know the man he killed, he nevertheless called out his name; and why he tried to pull the body out of the car. That Leary saw fit not to mention Nichols’ prior shooting, especially since he himself investigated it, is equally difficult for the family to understand.
But the biggest question for Pennington’s family is why Nichols shot him. According to the transcript of Leary and Rees’ post-shooting interview with Nichols, he told Rees he shot Pennington because he “made a lunge towards me,” a move that made him feel “really uncomfortable.” Rees subsequently claimed in a report that Pennington “ignored all of the commands given by the officers and jumped out his window at Officer Nichols.” That Pennington could have managed to, in the last few seconds of his life, maneuver into position to jump out of his car doesn’t ring true for his family, particularly given that he died with one of his legs hooked under the SUV’s steering column.
Nichols went on to tell Rees he did as he was trained, saying, “Freeze or I’ll shoot. Freeze or I’ll shoot,” but Pennington “just kept coming.” Nichols had no time other than to perceive “he’s not complying to what I’m saying,” so he shot him.
Since the 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case of Tennessee v. Garner, officers who use deadly force against a fleeing suspect have to show he or she poses a significant threat of death or physical injury to the officer or others. After Leary and Rees took a break, they came back into the West Jordan interview room and pressured Nichols on one point: As Pennington “lunged” toward Nichols, “Were you scared?” Rees asked.
“I’m cornered,” Nichols said. “I don’t have anywhere to go. I’m—I don’t know what he’s going to do. I’m stuck in a car.”
“Were you scared?” Rees repeated.
“Yes, I was scared, I guess. I—I don’t know.”
No trajectory evidence, according to the reports provided to the Penningtons, was gathered to determine where Pennington was shot. If Pennington’s location when shot was shot isn’t clear, neither is when he died. Nichols requested medical care for Pennington but did not check Pennington’s vitals, he told the investigators, as he appeared dead. “I just walked away from the scene,” He was pissed, he said, that Pennington “made me do what I had to do.” The lawsuit claims “neither Nichols nor Perez did anything to assist Pennington, even though Nichols knew Pennington was still alive.”
FLEEING FOR HIS LIFE
Of all the lingering questions surrounding the death of Wade Pennington, one of the most painful for his family is why he ran in the first place.
Dawn Boggs, the mother of Pennington’s son Tyler, says Pennington was afraid of very little. One day, while out fishing, she joked, “Wade, the cops are gonna get ya.” He replied, “They won’t shoot a guy like me.”
But when she saw him on the dashcam video, “I knew by the look on his face, he was scared to death. He knew they were out to get him.” Normally, she says, after a few minutes, Pennington, who had successfully evaded capture by the police in the past, would have given himself up. But that night “he knew something was wrong,” she says. “At some point in those [final] minutes, he knew if he didn’t get away from [Nichols] he was going to die.”
A year and half after Pennington’s death, the wound it opened in the lives of those who loved him refuses to heal. “None of us can get past it,” Boggs says. “We meet up at La Frontera” where he used to gather the family, “but it’s not the same.” His son, Boggs says, has been plagued by depression since his father’s death, and will “literally not come out of his room.”
Girlfriend Russell says, her voice breaking, that law enforcement “has no idea what they took away.” His mother says she can never “be fully happy again,” can never forgive Nichols nor the police departments that lied to her family, painting Pennington as a dangerous, violent man that he never was.
“No dollar amount can bring him back,” Judy Pennington says about the family’s lawsuit. “They took something very precious to me. They took my son.”







Have you ggogled the original story posted the day the shooting happened? If you want I can go word for word on what the media was told. Lets say the news would have stated the following; A man was sitting out side a business at 1.30 am in his vehicle when a police officer chased him for a moment until he realized there was no crime commited and according to their chase policy they could not chase. However another officer decided to chase him disregarding a direct order from his commanding officer to not pursue not only once but twice. After that another officer jumps in and starts ramminmg the suspect and claiming it was the suspect doing the ramminmg but in fact it was the officer. At one point they got into a cul de sac and both officers were ramming the suspect until one officer rams him with such force it moves the suspects car into a brick wall where the vehicle is pinned unable to move, at that point the suspect is ordered out of the vehicle by one officer and the other officer while sitting in his patrol car window rolled up shoots the suspect twice. At this point the officer jumps out of his patrol car and tries to pull the suspect out to make it appear he was lunging. He could not get the body fully out and decides to drop the body and then calls for medical. A while later he admits on camera there goes my job and realizes he is on camera on says oh no. Now thats the story that should have been told but go back to the original release and see what was stated and I think you will agree this story should be told in this manner!
This is a difficult story for me because in my heart I feel that this shooting was unjust. It did not fit the crime and that is wrong. However, I feel that the author presents only one side of the story. If this is the case, then I have to disregard it as another case of a journalist sensationalizing a story in order to cast law enforcement in a bad light. This is the problem with the media today and it threatens the foundation of this country. If the author wont at least acknowledge the wrongfulness of this man leading a high speed chase through neighborhoods, then what other facts are missing. Heartbreaking story, horrible reporting.
I'm really sorry that the Pennington family has had to go through this.
I see people commenting that this man should have pulled over and he would still be around - but I sincerely doubt it.
These cops knew his name. They knew who they were chasing. I'm sorry, but I think had he pulled over they would have been more careful to not leave their dashcams on and he still would have been killed wrongfully, there just wouldn't be any way to prove it since the cops would have better covered their tracks.
It pains me to have such low opinions for law enforcement officers, but I have seen how things work around here. A lot of the Utah police are liars, thugs and cowards. Hopefully there are a few good ones who will cross the blue line and eliminate the sociopathic cowards who are enjoying terrorizing citizens.
Even if he HAD burglarized a business - that would have been no justification for shooting him.
Internal affairs is useless, and the civilian review board is deaf, dumb, and blind.
I long for those long-lost days when police were honorable and worthy of respect, I really do.
Justice must be done. Wade Pennington was murdered, executed, gunned down by a trigger happy Big Badge gunslinger who knew he could beat the rap. If he truly was so scared, so panicky, what the hell was he doing on a police force? Aren't they supposed to be among the "best and the brightest'? Shooting a cornered unarmed man through your car's closed window shouting "Freeze" knowing only the camcorder can hear you? Not having the basic decency to try to save the fellow human being crying in pain from your deady act? Then lying with the collaboration of colleagues and superiors to make sure you're in the clear? Who's the real criminal here? I have known Garry, Judy, Denny, Dustin and yes, Wade, for 40 years. No family deserves what they've been through and put through by the colluding authorities, but especially not the Penningtons, wonderful, caring helping people who must now bear the unbearable. I am so glad for all the effort their pain has produced to get Wade's story out. This outrage must not go unrectified. Wade's life was snuffed in the most ghastly manner; he cannot be returned to the very many who loved him, but regrets must be voiced, amends must be made. Justice must be done.