citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page

Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Hits & Misses /  Teacher Tattoos, Ethics Enforcement & Petition Signature Removal
Hits & Misses

Teacher Tattoos, Ethics Enforcement & Petition Signature Removal

By Josh Loftin
Posted // March 10,2010 -
Share
SAD.jpgBad Ink
A new dress code for teachers in the Ogden School District that prohibits visible tattoos has led to disciplinary actions against at least one current teacher, who has a tattoo tribute to his wife and children on one of his forearms. The teacher, Mark Johnson, who has taught English for 15 years at Ogden High, told the Standard-Examiner he opposes the ban because it is “keeping the stigma of tattooed people alive.” The district contends that the tattoo ban is part of an overall effort to have teachers dress more professionally and dovetails with requirements for things like collared shirts for men. However, considering that attitudes towards tattoos have changed dramatically over the past decade and many 20-somethings have well-inked skin, the ban will only serve as one more obstacle to recruiting teachers. Isn’t Utah’s low pay for teachers enough of a challenge?

SMILEY.jpgBaby Step
It appears that, at least in some form, the Legislature will have stricter ethical standards next year, including an independent ethics commission. Yes, commissioners will be appointed by the Legislature, a flaw that supporters of an ethics initiative say nullifies the independence. But with a formula that seats three retired judges and two former legislators serving as the commissioners, the potential exists for actual enforcement of ethics rules, depending, of course, on who gets appointed. At the very least, it is proof that the threat of an ethics ballot initiative is forcing legislators to deal with ethics internally, something they have not done very well in the past.

SAD.jpgOne-Sided Overtime
Unless Gov. Gary Herbert vetoes House Bill 275, people can now have their names removed from initiative petitions up to a month after the deadline for collecting signatures. The change defies logic. After all, people cannot call and have their name added to the petition after the deadline, so why should they be able to remove it? Signing a petition is a civic duty not unlike voting—and, just as voters cannot go to the county clerk and ask for their votes to be changed weeks after elections, they should not be able to remove their signatures. Oh, and one more thing: People who signed a petition and then decided they oppose it can still vote it down at the polls. That’s the messy nature of democracy, a word that far too often is considered foul among legislators.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // March 11,2010 at 11:26

For the record: Having the Legislative leadership appoint 3 retired judges and 2 former legislatures is not what makes the Legislature's independent ethics commission so flawed. More troublesome are: 1) it will be so difficult for any citizen to file a complaint, 2) commission hearings on the merits not be public, 3) a commission report of an ethics violation cannot include the evidence but only a recommendation to a politically partisan (4-4) legislative ethics committee, and 4) any recommendation must be agreed to by a super majority of 4 of the 5 commissioners.

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close