citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page

Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Rant Control /  The Innovative Sex Lives of Prophets
Rant Control

The Innovative Sex Lives of Prophets

By Jesse Fruhwirth
Posted // October 28,2009 -

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints apostle Dallin Oaks famously told BYU-Idaho graduates Oct. 13 that the negative attention Mormons received after Proposition 8’s passage has been similar to the intimidation of Southern black voters in decades past. Under the din of criticism that analogy received, Oaks made other comments that have mostly escaped criticism. They didn’t escape CityWeekly.net comment luminary Hayduke, however.

In response to comments about John Saltas’s Private Eye column, [“Dallin Oaks, Foot in Mouth,” Oct. 22] in which LDS apologists accused Saltas and others of taking out-of-context Oaks' civil-rights comparison, Hayduke asked:

“Could you please explain why Jo[seph] Smith had over 30 wives and Brigham Young had over 50 even though Oaks said this, ‘We follow Jesus Christ by adhering to God’s law of marriage, which is marriage between one man and one woman. This commandment has been in place from the very beginning.’” (emphasis ours)

Thank you, Hayduke, for showing that the context was as misleading as the most famous quote.

Rant Control’s take is that even more peculiar than a misread of African-American history is LDS leaders misrepresentation of the church’s own history. The church rails against same-sex marriage in the name of eternal tradition but fails to recognize the church’s history of modifying its definition of marriage twice: By instituting polygamy, then by ending it.

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // December 13,2009 at 10:01

Plural Marriage was never eliminated, it's practice was put on hold; it is still a eternal Celestial law.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // October 28,2009 at 14:08

Jesse:

What can I say except thanks? I've been called lots of things before, but never have I been referred to as a luminary. And thanks for posing my question once more. It would be great if somebody within the faith could address it. It'd be friggin' awesome if Dallin Oaks tried.

 

Posted // November 16,2009 at 13:49 - It's two weeks later. I'm still waiting.

 

Posted // October 29,2009 at 17:55 - Thanks to you, Hayduke! And I'm with you: still waiting for an answer to your question.

 

Posted // October 29,2009 at 08:10 - Judging from the ratings (one star thus far), it looks like the truth is bothering the brethren. Don't worry, guys (and sisters, of course), just plug your ears, cover your eyes and forget it - this will all go away. Nobody expected you to actually explain anything, anyway.

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close