citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page

Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Staff Box /  New Congressional Districts
Staff Box

New Congressional Districts

By City Weekly Staff
Posted // December 22,2010 - How would you set the new district boundaries?

Dan Nailen: The perimeter of my Sugar Hood bungalow, so I could elect myself and get in on that fat PAC cash.

Jesse Fruhwirth:
I’d split the greater Wasatch Front area into three hunks stacked neatly north to south and give all the rest of Utah the fourth seat.

Bryan Mannos: What’s the difference between three and four rubber stamps? Why don’t we just give it to the LDS Church in trade for them letting their members choose for themselves?

Wallace Greenwell: 1. Salt Lake County. 2. Weber County and north, 3. Davis and Utah counties, 4. the rest of the state.

Austen Diamond: I’d cut it twice diagonally, cut off the crust, spear each section with a toothpick and garnish with a pickle. Politics never sounded so tasty.

Susan Kruithof: I’d let City Weekly’s Nick Clark’s 2-year-old, Elly, draw them for us. It would be more equitable then anything Utah is going to come up with.

Derek Carlisle:
Let the boundaries be set anew by alternating turns of calling out locations. If that area has been taken, the opponent would call out “You sank my district line” and so on until the new boundaries have been claimed. I have an idea of how the boards should look if they need help.

Jerre Wroble:
If the redistricting committee were made up of visionaries instead of partisan hacks, Utah would have two Democrat-leaning districts (SLC proper, Park City, Carbon County) and two GOP-loving districts (everywhere else). A balanced slate of congressional delegates would engage non-Republican voters who currently shrug their shoulders and say “What’s the use in voting?”
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // December 25,2010 at 08:29

Jerry Wroble's comment is so visionary and profound that it should be framed and sent to the powers-that-be. Seriously; how can we ignore the obvious for so long?

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close