citylog
Sign up for City Weekly's...
Newsletter - Free Stuff - Dining Info - Music Info

Email:

Text CITYWEEKLY to 75568
to receive updates on Free Stuff & Events

PROUDLY SUPPORTS
Buy Local FirstHumane SocietyPlanned Parenthood
SLC Arts CouncilDowntown Alliance
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page
Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Opinion / Private Eye /  Private Eye | Sarah the Terrible: Palin is either Dan Quayle 2.0 or a performing seal.
Private Eye

Private Eye | Sarah the Terrible: Palin is either Dan Quayle 2.0 or a performing seal.

By John Saltas
Posted // October 1,2008 - Despite what all those letter-to-the-editor Utah mamas had to say when Sarah Palin was named as John McCain’s running mate—“We love her! She’s one of us!!”—Palin has subsequently proven to be the weakest candidate for high office since Dan Quayle. For every misspelled word in Quayle’s vocabulary, and for each of his decidedly dumb statements, like how Republicans understand the “bondage” between a mother and child, Quayle looks decidedly professorial next to Palin. Next to Quayle, Palin looks like a dunce, a flunky, a poser. With each of her recent indecipherable statements, Palin has managed to do what no editorial board nor newspaper censor has ever managed: She’s silenced the hypocritical self-righteous pens of those Utah mamas who were so eager to embrace her as their very own. She’s just like them all right, right down to the sand over her eyes.

“Poor Sarah,” goes the current chorus as even her former supporters peel away like the dead skin in a dandruff commercial. Poor Sarah? She bit this off of her own accord. In three major interviews since the Republican National Convention, Palin has commingled McCain’s staff-written talking points, has yet to connect two thoughts and cannot give definitive answers to even the simplest questions. Not counting her interview with Sean Hannity, that is. As is his wont, he phrased his questions with the answers inside them, then asked if Sarah agreed. After his parade of queries that amounted to “What’s your favorite color, Hon?” Hannity, prize-winning water-bucket carrier that he is, pronounced Palin fit for office. That’s like Bonnie being endorsed by Clyde.

It’s actually poor McCain we should worry about. If he had chosen his running mate predicated on skill and leadership instead of calculated electoral math, our country wouldn’t be lacking 25 percent of the important voices needed right now to help Americans of all stripes make sense of our current financial crisis. Instead, Palin is sequestered in some study room prepping for her Thursday debate with Joe Biden. What would she do about this monetary mess and what words of encouragement can she offer the taxpaying public? Your guess is as good as mine. My guess is that she doesn’t have a clue. She’ll have one ready for Thursday night, though, when she delivers the lines her scriptwriters are crafting for her. Assuming she can remember them.

I’d never heard of Sarah Palin until last month. I’ve also never heard of Alan Mashburn, Hunt Willoughby or Brad Ramsay, either. By my take, each of those men are as qualified as Sarah Palin to be United States president, too, but for some odd reason, John McCain looked right past them and their small-town mayoral bona fides. Mashburn is the mayor of Vernal. Willoughby runs the city of Alpine just over the hill. Ramsay is the leader of one my favorite Utah towns, Richfield. Their three cities are nearly equal in population to Sarah Palin’s Wasilla, Alaska. Park City’s Dana Williams runs a city of similar size, too, but, thanks to his farming skills, care for the environment and his performing in a band, I’ve heard of Williams. That shouldn’t have disqualified him.

Isn’t it a bit odd that the Utahns who were once ashen and aghast at the prospect of Ross “Rocky” Anderson running for the presidency were the first endorsers of Palin? They cited her mayoral experience as evidence of her vice-presidential qualifications. I can find fault with Rocky on nearly any day of the week. But if anyone thinks, in terms of burnishing a résumé, that mayorship in Wasilla rises to the level of mayor of Salt Lake City, they’ve likely got a moose rack stuck in a hideous place it doesn’t belong. If that’s the dumb part, here’s the dumber: If the maverick McCain had chosen maverick Anderson—who is eminently more eloquent and more qualified than Palin, and who does not have an unmarried, pregnant daughter—those same Utahns would have forgiven all and gone with a McCain and Anderson ticket. Why? Better a Republican ticket with only one pro-choice, anti-discrimination candidate than a Democratic ticket with two.

It’s well known that Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. is a McCain supporter and has been for a very long time. He even bucked conventional wisdom and other pressures by not jumping on the Mitt Romney bandwagon. I’ve agreed with Huntsman on many things and genuinely like the guy. He let a crappy liquor bill get by, but that’s Kahlua under the bridge. If McCain wanted a strong and popular governor, why didn’t he pick Huntsman over Alaska’s governor? Especially since the Rocky Mountain states are going to be critical in November’s election. Two reasons: Left and right ovaries, which he lacks.

Sarah Palin claims that since Alaska is bordered by two foreign countries, she has foreign-policy experience. Using Palin logic, Huntsman could have delivered better political leverage for McCain: Utah borders Nevada, therefore Huntsman’s an expert on gaming and loose women. Our Wyoming border yields him knowledge of rodeo and oil, and Idaho lends him Farmer Steve potato-farming know-how. Colorado and Arizona deliver him the goods on water producers and users. Living in Utah has rounded out our guv. And that doesn’t even count his time as an authentic foreign ambassador. Palin thinks that foreign country was New Mexico—which also abuts Utah—but it was actually Singapore.

Huntsman would have been a brilliant choice compared to Palin. So would Kukla, Fran and Ollie, but why disparage those who cannot speak? Oh, yeah, that would be Sarah Palin, too. Be nice if you want. But if I want to watch a performing seal, I’ll buy a ticket to SeaWorld.

Staffbox

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // October 5,2008 at 12:53 I’m not John Saltas but I will answer JUNEBUG’S questions to the best of my limited ability:nThe debate on Thursday was interesting. I thought Joe did well and want to find what kind of toothpaste he uses -- WooWee, pretty. Sarah apparently had a forum again to wink and be beautiful. WooWeee, pretty.nThe debate didn’t change my mind. I’m still voting for Ron Paul. Really, we live in Utah -- will our vote for President matter much? Utah, people!nI did notice the mircrophone was turned on for Sarah and off for Biden, but I didn’t think much of it.nI somewhat believe Sarah is being targeted, but isn’t that what elections are all about? I have noticed a blatant effort by the newscasters to show who they like or dislike, which honestly, I never much noticed in previous elections.nNow... who is this Ayers? You say he is an American Terrorist? I will have to Google him and find out about him before I can answer that question. I am a Generation Xer and I still dig my Mtv.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // October 5,2008 at 12:17 I am wondering what John Saltas thought about the debate on Thursday evening. Did it change his mind? Did he notice the microphone was turned on at the beginning and end of Sarah’s appearance but not Biden’s? Does Saltas somewhat believe Sarah’s being targeted whatsoever?nI do not change my opinions along with Mr. Saltas but I do highly regard them, so I’m just wondering.nI am a conservative and knew I had to vote republican because that is closest to what I value on the issue’s. However, I wasn’t to excited about McCain. And, Obama kind of scares me. But, after McCain got Palin on board it has been much more exciting to say the least. nOh another question: I am also wondering what Saltas thinks about Obama’s connection to Ayers? Does anybody care that Obama may or may not be friends with American Terrorists? (Honest questions -- not sarcastic)

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // October 5,2008 at 07:15 Nugget: you insult eighth graders. Palin Power: you are an ocean of stupidity, a sea of mediocrity. Palin has demonstrated nothing, NOTHING, to suggest she has intelligence. McCain’s choice of a running mate was nothing but a cynical display of hypocrisy. It’s common worldwide knowledge that Bush is a disgrace, his presidency will be mocked and degraded by decent thinking people for eons. The damage he has done to this country, nay, to the entire world, is immeasurable and won’t be righted for generations. That said, a McCain presidency would enshrine Bush’s as enlightened.nnIf McCain and Palin are the best the Republican party can give to this nation, it’s no wonder that party has lost its way. So many prominent Republicans have been convicted of crimes and many of those are behind bars. So are their lobbying cohorts. nnOne can only surmise that people who think McCain and Palin are good for this country, are nuts. Out of touch with reality. Round the bend.nnIt’s Utah, we must say, and that adds great light to the right-wing thinking. We know where it originates. Look at the make up of the legislature. There are some good people there, for sure, but by and large most in the GOP are bigots, hustlers and thieves. Where do these idiots come from? One wonders what moves them to be so power hungry.nnI digress. McCain and Palin are an insult to the people of America. nnPure and simple.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // October 3,2008 at 21:58 Sarah Palin has more wisdom in her little pinkie than all of you commentors combined.nLook where she is at and then look where you are at. Hmmm... maybe she is all the nasty things you say she is, but coming from a liberal alternative paper, that isn’t surprising whatsoever. Besides... you represent about 2 percent of Utah so good luck with that.nPALIN POWER! ha ha ha ha ha...

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // October 2,2008 at 09:26 It doesn’t take courage to withstand torture. If you’re being tortured you have no choice but to withstand it or sing or die. McCain did not withstand his torture but rather sang like a little birdie for the VC. He admitted as much during his speak at the GOP convention. He was a rat then and still is. nnSo he flew fighter planes. So what? He wasn’t that good at it, obviously. My granddad blew the shit out of dozens of Germans as a tail gunner and, were he still alive, he’d be the last person to state that he was a hero because of it. He’d never brag about it. He did what he had to do. Nothing more.nnI hate it when people post dictionary definitions.

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close