citylog
Sign up for City Weekly's...
Newsletter - Free Stuff - Dining Info - Music Info

Email:

Text CITYWEEKLY to 75568
to receive updates on Free Stuff & Events

PROUDLY SUPPORTS
Buy Local FirstHumane SocietyPlanned Parenthood
SLC Arts CouncilDowntown Alliance
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page
Tumblr.jpg Google_Plus.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Opinion / Private Eye /  Private Eye | Get Raid: Utah’s Legislature doesn’t have time for polygamists
Private Eye

Private Eye | Get Raid: Utah’s Legislature doesn’t have time for polygamists

By John Saltas
Posted // April 16,2008 - Just when I thought it was chelada weather, things turned. It’s the middle of April and you’d think it’s time to gather up the pumpkins. It’s flat-out cold and windy today. Due to this cold, I’ve done what I normally pass on—I’ve planted cabbage-family crops. Technically, what I’ve planted are cole crops, members of the mustard family, but who outside an agronomist has ever heard of cole crops?

Cole crops are hearty, and they like the cold. They’re the Aleuts of the vegetable world. But I hate the damned bugs they attract. I’ve tried everything from soap-and-water baths to Bacillus thuringiensis to companion plantings (dill and rosemary are said to repel the bad cabbage bugs or something like that). I’ve learned it’s best to just tolerate cole plants. In a good year, I get three brussels sprouts and a quarter head of cabbage. My broccoli and cauliflower? By mid-June, they look like caterpillar-larvae hotels. My harsh measures do little good.

Meanwhile, my tomatoes wait. I could protect them in any number of ways, but I’ve lost them before doing so, too. And that’s the rub—no matter how hard you try to protect something you really like, it doesn’t always work out. President Kennedy had lots of protection in Dallas. People get flu shots every year and still get the flu. Mark Eaton was always protected the basket but the Jazz didn’t win every game. Polygamists fled to rural Texas to peacefully practice whatever it was they believe in, and look how nicely that worked out.

Many people who comment about the FLDS call them a bunch of loony kooks trapped in a time warp of misguided beliefs and dated religious and sexual practices. That may be true, but being loony isn’t against the law—if it were, don’t you think it would be a wiser spending of tax dollars to raid the Utah Legislature? Not only are they primarily loony, they fill their pockets at your expense at a greater clip than polygamist groups do.

Worse, our legislators weren’t born into looniness but came into it via that time-worn path of ignorance and self-entitlement. We all hear that wah-wah that polygamists strain the system because their large families need government assistance in any manner of ways from welfare to health care. As you’re astute, you know those are the same things said about illegals. I’d rather give $100 to any part-time needy Jessop, Barlow or Jeffs than give a dime to a full-time greedy legislator like Springville Rep. Aaron Tilton, who has all the time in the world for his special interests, but none for you.

The Legislature doesn’t have time for polygamists, either. Not that it’s fully to blame for what happened in Texas, but virtually every Utah state legislator for decades has done next to nothing regarding polygamy. Not counting whiny speeches, that is. Nary a thumbs up or thumbs down. Utah has been blind and mute regarding polygamy since the LDS Church formally forbade the practice in favor of statehood in the 1890s.

Informally, most everyone around here knows that formality is a joke. Not because modern-day Mormons secretly practice polygamy—and some do, risking excommunication from the LDS Church—but because despite what evils may lurk in the hearts of the polygamist collective, the majority of Utahns remain sympathetic to polygamists. I know I am.

That comes with the turf of being descended from a polygamist, which I’ve never kept secret or tried to deny like certain Leavitts and Romneys try to do. I’m from the lineage of the fifth wife, so without polygamy, I wouldn’t even be here. I know, you’re thanking your lucky stars that Matthew Caldwell felt compelled to marry five times in the 1800s so that you could be reading this. Me, too. Outside of feeling the daily tug of gravity, polygamy is about the only thing I have in common with what is likely half the population of Utah—my fellow descendents of Utah’s halcyon days of plural marriage.

I talk to liberals who say smoking pot shouldn’t be illegal because it doesn’t hurt anyone. Polygamists give a similar defense of their lifestyle. I talk to conservatives who say private property and personal freedoms are sacrosanct. Polygamists say that’s all they really want. Then, come raid time, liberals and conservatives both pounce on the polygamists with equal measures of moral superiority.

Here’s what I don’t understand. Polygamy is against the law, plain and simple. Yet, who gets arrested for polygamy? Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff has rounded up a couple of high-profile polygamists, but that’s about it—and what were the charges? Tax evasion? Child abuse? Overdue power bill? Ever heard of a polygamist wife being arrested? From where I’m sitting, I could hit a polygamist even by spitting into the wind, but I see no sign of Mr. Shurtleff. Except on TV where he talks about how he scared the Jeffs family all the way to San Angelo. Nice. About 60,000 to go, Mark.

And, of course, it’s the kids. No child should be abused or forced into any sexual submission ever. But you tell me—that sure was a lot of manpower down there that may yield some bone fide crimes committed at the FLDS compound. Meanwhile, child abuse continues on at a nearly unabated pace in the rest of Texas and Utah. Just as I always use the wrong insecticide and can never eradicate all my garden bugs, the wrong methods were used in Texas—and Hildale and Colorado City—because all you’re getting are the obvious and few. Bugs and child abusers are everywhere. Polygamy is just where they sometimes land.

Staffbox

 

 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // April 30,2008 at 20:53 To the point. Child molestation and child rape cannot be tolerated and if there is evidence it should be acted apon. Often the details of such situations veer us from the task at hand. That task as we stand is to provide protection for the child(ren) while it is investigated.nnBecause I consider myself a simple thinker and not amongst the elite journalistic minds, the likes of which produced this collumn, I have to resort to a hypothetical.... nnImagine a household of 4 children where there is evidence that one is being abused. Do you:nnA. Interview the child and the suspect(s) occasionally and leave the child there in danger?nnB. Remove the child, leaving the siblings while you investigate?nnC. Remove all 4 children while you investigate?nnD. Don’t do anything...they are polygamists so we shouldn’t bother them?nnE. ? nnPlease let me know what the best choice is. Fill in the blank for option E to really tell me how dumb I am.nnThanks in advance.nBermudaJoe

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // April 24,2008 at 19:09 John Saltas,n nI call you OUT on your professionalism and the pretense that you actually know individuals who practice polygamy and are members on record AND active in the LDS faith who have somehow duped the leadership with their secrecy. The claim was made in City Weekly’s article, Get Raid, April 17, 2008 (...modernday Mormons secretly practice polygamy...). Having traveled worldwide and previously lived in the U.S. from the Deep South to the Northwest, I know of none such evidence among the thousands of persons I have been acquainted with in the dozens of geographical areas in which I have lived. Because of many current misleading statements about the subject and the seriousness of it, a journalist would be very naive to think readers would frivolously accept a statement written with such intensity. This statement would be accepted by the community you seek to enlighten as a journalist as a common truth of which it is not. The point of the article, and supporting statements written by you have the sincerity of Charles Schultz’s character Linus waiting for the Great Pumpkin. These persons do not exist in my experience and if they did are far less common than a monogamist who doesn’t monog. n nYou now have the opportunity to show evidence of these individuals or publically retract your claim. (Mormons of record who are polygamists, please write in so I won’t have to sue these SOB’s.)n nAlso, (I just cannot let you get away with another one as long as I’m troubling myself to respond) Attorney General Mark Shurtliff is THE reason Warren Jeffs was convicted here in the state of Utah, for the first time...not Arizona; not Texas! You wrote: Utah has been blind and mute regarding polygamy since the LDS Church formally forbade the practice in favor of statehood in the 1890’s as if it also were true. How dare you blatently ignore the recent effort by Utah’s law enforcement and judicial system! The Utah Mormons CAN be charged with APATHY if not polygamy for failing to be outraged at your claim. A great deal of effort was spent by law enforcement to show compliance with the laws of the State of Utah resulting in the conviction of a known polygenist. Texas will not likely do as well. It is malice on your part to mislead such a wide collective readership.n nCheck the facts: Webster’s dictionary states that polygeny is the practice of one husband having multiple wives. Polyandry is a woman having many husbands. Polygamy is plural marriage inclusive of both. The persons we commonly call polygamists are usually practicing polygeny. n nThe owners of the paper have the responsibility to clarify your claim as untrue, produce evidence or retract your misleading statements. The cost of the legality of this incidence is of no concern. Let’s hear from your legal department if you have one. Incidently, I’m as big a fan of your paper as I am of any church. I am a fan of truth.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // April 22,2008 at 12:36 As an ex-pait Utahn, I ofter read this column. Prior to today, I would have agreed with the Author, the only thing we may in common is our similar ancestry. After reading this well thought out piece, I can identify one more. A sympathy for these people, flawed, opinoniated, self-righteous and Human as they are. Excellent and I could not agree more.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // April 21,2008 at 10:57 You know what, I think they are on the right track here. I think this is long overdue myself.nnJJnwww.Ultimate-Anonymity.com

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // April 21,2008 at 07:26 I’ll bet that what really sucks for Mr. Saltas is the fact that, instead of arguing the finer points of his column, instead of debating the issue he puts forth, people spend more energy talking about how well John writes.nnIn all likelihood, John probably doesn’t give a rat’s ass whether you like his shit or not. He’s gonna write it, anyway.

 

 
 
 
Close
Close
Close