citylog
The E-
Edition:
CW
page
by page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Cover Story /  Steam Dream: Utah's Geothermal Energy Potential Page 1
Cover Story

Steam Dream: Utah's Geothermal Energy Potential Page 1

Utah tempts entrepreneurs with its trifecta of renewable energy sources.

By Jim Catano
Posted // September 1,2010 -

It’s the kind of thing that’s “hiding in plain sight.” Most renewable-energy sources are so obvious and abundant, they're almost invisible. But go outside on a sunny day, and it’s easy to feel a lot of energy streaming down from the sun. Same thing on a blustery day, when the potential power is made apparent by the bending trees.

Entrepreneurs are racing to tap both wind and solar energies as fossil fuels become ever more difficult to find and the atmosphere warms from burning them. But no matter where you go, the most abundant, clean, constant, renewable energy of all is never more than just a couple of miles away ... straight down.

It would be about a 4,000-mile trip to the center of this planet, but barely scratch the surface and things already begin to heat up. In fact, many mines are limited in depth because temperatures become too high for humans to work in. At the earth’s core is a huge mass of molten iron and nickel that may reach as high as 12,000 degrees. Things cool closer to the surface, but the crust’s shifting tectonic plates also generate intense heat as they push and rub against each other.

Especially near fault lines in the western half of the continent, temperatures reach extreme levels at only a few thousand feet below the surface, and ground-water that flows down through fissures becomes superheated under intense pressure. If that geologically heated water makes its way back to the surface, it appears in hot springs, and the heat it carries with it is known as geothermal energy.

HostingGenerator.jpgYellowstone National Park is one place where hot springs abound, and many there have the extra attraction of shooting up as geysers or bubbling into beautiful mineral-encrusted pools. While those are vivid indicators of geothermal power, there have never been serious proposals to tap those resources commercially within the park’s boundaries.

But, there are places where a vast amount of geothermal heat rises fairly close to the surface and is relatively easy to reach, transform into electricity and pump into the power grid for transmission to urban centers. A high number of such hot spots exist right here in Utah—second only to Nevada in discovered geothermal resources. The central Intermountain West (including Wyoming and Colorado) is often described as the “Saudi Arabia of geothermal energy.” And Utah has the added advantage of not only having an abundant supply of geothermal, but its geothermal resources are located on land where ample moving air could drive wind farms and regular sunshine could power solar facilities.

These thrice-blessed regions are also near existing power transmission lines, allowing all three types of renewable energy to get plugged into the grid at about the same point, an advantage similar zones in Nevada don’t share. In a word, Utah’s renewable power potential is almost ideal, and at least one company is going after it in a big way.

Raser's Edge
I had no idea of Utah’s abundance of geothermal energy before meeting David West at a party. He’s the marketing vice president of the Provo-based Raser Technologies.

Besides designing advanced electric powertrains for vehicles (you may spot Raser’s red, experimental H3 Hummer on the road sporting the number “100,” meaning 100 miles per gallon), the company’s main activity is developing geothermal energy. And Raser’s flagship project is closer to coming to market than are its automotive electric motors, transmissions and controllers. In fact, West says, Raser has already been supplying Anaheim, Calif., with green energy for more than a year.

A growing slice of Disneyland’s power now comes from an unlikely place. Several miles outside the hamlet of Minersville, Utah—west of Beaver, Utah—in the middle of some of the sparsest, driest, most wind-blown terrain in the state, sits Raser’s first operational geothermal generating plant in Thermo.

It’s not some monster that can be seen for miles spewing fumes into the air. It’s a low-profile facility with structures that aren’t much taller than those of its only neighbor: Circle 4 Farms produces more than a million pigs for slaughter every year in compounds that appear in the distance across the barren landscape. The overpowering odor coming from massive manmade lagoons of hog excrement and urine are an extra reminder that no one wants to live in this place, where conditions don’t allow anything to grow more than 2 feet above the desert floor

But here’s where Raser struck gold—superheated water, really—and it’s relatively close to the surface. A little more than a mile down, Raser’s drills hit fairly hot water under high pressure that makes its way to the surface without much encouragement. It’s run through a heat exchanger (think of something akin to a car radiator) where the heat is transferred into an organic, nontoxic liquid that flashes into steam and spins a series of 50 SUV-size generating turbines.

The company claims this “binary” system, developed in conjunction with United Technologies, offers several advantages over older “flash” systems, in which turbines are driven directly by steam from the mineral-laden groundwater that’s corrosive to metal components. These smaller units are easier to build than a typical geothermal plant that uses a single large generator. One of those can take five to seven years to develop, while a modular plant like Raser’s can be brought on line in about two years.

West is enthused because advancements in generator technology during the past two years have seen advancements in performance equivalent to those in computers. Since Raser brought its first generators on line, improvements have boosted efficiency by 30 percent and output has tripled, and he anticipates five-fold increases in those numbers in the near future.

He claims that the “brown vs. green” energy competition soon will be won by geothermal without factoring in the “externalized” expenses that fossil-fuel power generation gets away without paying for, especially the environmental and human costs of pollution.

The biggest improvement, West says, is that its newer equipment can use water at temperatures of less than 250 degrees, as opposed to the 300 to 600 degrees previously needed. That means that vast geothermal resources that could not be utilized previously can now be tapped.

Continue reading: Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Read All
 
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post a comment
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // September 1,2010 at 10:10

Home Run article. Researched, factual, compelling. Catano should be assigned a cover once a month--with his last two successes. Intriguing across many levels--gender, generational, cultural, political. Learning while reading--isn't THAT the goal? Should be.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // September 1,2010 at 20:04

Excellent and encouraging article. This subject should be vigorously pursued by your editors, so that public knowledge and interest remain high. Thanks for running it.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // September 2,2010 at 08:50

Baloney! This "reporter" just reprinted company propaganda without doing any research of his own. That's why this article is so full of BS.

 

Posted // September 4,2010 at 11:46 - Great article!... just the kind of eye-opening information that "Some Guys" need to hear!

 

Posted // September 4,2010 at 18:02 - A lot of BS--that was no doubt spoon fed the reported from raser. For instance this statement made by David West...." Since Raser brought its first generators on line, improvements have boosted efficiency by 30 percent and output has tripled, and he anticipates five-fold increases in those numbers in the near future." It is physically impossible for the units to increase production five-fold. Look at the specs on the units. It just can't be done.

 

Posted // September 6,2010 at 21:21 - You did spot a typo, harlydog. And those do sometimes occur in the haste of editing. Raser will increase output by five times over its original phase by adding additional generators at that site. Likewise, increases in efficiency are ongoing. Consider the Raser/United Technologies low-temperature binary generator design over conventional flash generators plus future advances that are in process or anticipated...similar to what happens with computer technology. But you said you know the specs of Raser's generators, so let's hear your analysis of them. By the way, tell us what industry you work in and if your investment portfolio includes any energy stocks. Oh, and as far as typos, there are two others. Let's see if you and Some Guy are sharp enough to find those. :) Hint---they are neither factual nor substantive...but knock yourselves out anyway.

 

Posted // September 7,2010 at 04:56 - Note to "Some Guy:" When I researched this article, I compared what Raser execs told me to other data from industry and academe about things like the costs associated with the various forms of power generation. What I saw, of course, were conflicts, but Raser's fell within the ranges I'd found, so I used theirs since that company is a local example of what's going on in the renewable energy industry. I'm not a geologist, engineer, scientist, accountant nor do I have a credential that would allow me to write a detailed dissertation in any specific subject area of power generation. Nor do I think the typical City Weekly reader expects such a thing neatly wrapped up in 3,500 words. One thing of which I was reminded, however, is that industries often like to have "fun with numbers" in order to burnish their images in what they make available for public consumption. That often involves burying "inconvenient data" like favorable tax treatment and other freebies given to them by third parties to develop power resources, encourage employment, stimulate local economies, etc. Another tactic is to avoid the discussion of downstream costs. One example of that is the nuclear power industry's typical "forgetting" of the cost to de-commission a hotly contaminated nuclear power plant after it's lived its functional life and must be shut down. Yes, I was reminded that full disclosure is important in any discussion of this matter. Therefore, I look forward to knowing your real name, your academic or professional credentials, and how you may be financially tied, perhaps through your investments, to any particular form of power generation. It can only help to further the discussion intelligently without resorting to name calling, unsupported statements or over-generalizations, don't you think? Otherwise what we say is just that much more bull sh....errrr, well, you know.

 

Posted // September 16,2010 at 09:21 - Since you ask Jim--I will answer. here are the specs of the Purecycle units: Electric power (gross) 280 kW @ 480V / 3 phase / 60 Hz, 272 kW @ 400V / 3 phase / 50 Hz Electric power (net) 225 to 260 kW* It may be tough to read the numbers--due to the formatting of the comment section. The bottom line is the max you can expect per unit is 260KW. With 50 units, that equates to 13MW. They are now getting 6-6.5MW--so to increase output five times to 30MW it would be impossible with the current units. Now if they say they are going to increase output five times by increasing the number of units in place they will need to place an additional 200 units in operation and drill an additional 20 working wells. Alternatively they could increase output on the current units to maximum and max out all new units and they would only have to add 100 additional units. The number of wells is based on temperature and flow. Neither of these scenarios is going to happen. I doubt they have the well permits and we know they don’t have the money. Jim it is not you that I question, it is the company I currently own Nevada Geothermal, Energy Solutions, Gasco Energy Chevron, Duke Energy, Marathon Oil & Spectra Energy. I really don't care to look for typos; I do find interest in the misinformation raser gives out

 

Posted // September 17,2010 at 20:44 - I forwarded this to Raser management. I let you know when they respond if they don't post here. I know the cooling tower they built is capable of supporting more banks of generators supplied by different wells.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // September 2,2010 at 09:00

This article has a biased undertone. Why not discuss the technology without the politics? Geothermal energy is great. However, geothermal technology comes with costs (this article is ignorant of cradle to grave principles), and oil sands, nuclear, etc. have their benefits. Geothermal without hydrofracking is like planting ten acres of corn, but only picking 1 acre because a large corn field in Switzerland was contaminated.

 

Posted // September 6,2010 at 21:39 - First, technology doesn't happen without "politics." In fact, the fossil fuel industry thrives on a gift basket of benefits bestowed on it by various layers of government in addition to the free rides it gets by "externalizing" (read that as "avoiding") social, health and environmental consequences of its activities from the oil fields of Nigeria to the CO2 spewing stacks of power plants across the world. And Basel, Switzerland was nearly completely leveled by an earthquake in the 14th Century. The Swiss were rightly concerned when fracking there immediately caused a mid-size quake. Other communities where similar geology exists are also rightfully concerned. Geothermal projects that occur near the most seismically active fault lines have the advantage of being in rock with greater permeability (due to more regular movement underground) and which does not require fracking. That's the low-hanging fruit we should be going after first. And we don't want fracking to be causing problems like it's doing in the East where unregulated use of the method for natural gas extraction is causing wide-spread ground water contamination. People in those areas are experiencing significant health problems. Some can even light on fire the "water" coming from their taps. Strike a match, and their faucets shoot out flames due to all the natural gas that comes out, too. Go watch the film "Gasland," and then we further debate the wisdom of fracking everything in sight.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Posted // September 2,2010 at 09:02

Raser, the company mentioned, is buying 3MW of dirty coal power from Rocky Mountian power. They deliver about 6mw to Anaheim, so half of what they sell as renewable, is actually coal power. If you dont believe me, check out their latest earnings confernce call. Thier plant, that is delevering apx 3mw net clean energy cost in excess of $130 million to build. The tax credit they recieved, per MW, is the largest given out and certainly a waste of tax payer money. While geothermal certainly has potential, the economics that raser has shown does not make thier method of developing it viable.

The solar array going in on top of the Salt Palace is estimated to produce 2.6MW and according to the SL trib article estimated costs are $10 million.

So which is better $10 million to produce 2.6MW or $130 million to produce just over 3MW net.

 

Posted // September 3,2010 at 21:05 - Given the critical need for clean energy, Utah should aggressively develop its geothermal resources. I have looked into Raser and I applaud what they are trying to do. Applying "distributed generation" to geothermal is a novel and significant undertaking that could yield more dependable, lower cost energy as the technology matures. Geothermal plays an key role in our country's renewable energy plan. Due to the intermittent nature of wind and solar, actual power generated is usually only about 24%-30% of the total capacity on average. The 2.6 MW total capacity at the Salt Palace will likely deliver a little over a half a megawatt, increasing the Cost/MW by 3 to 4 times. Geothermal delivers 24/7 and can help displace coal... the ultimate objective. Even the prototype plant by Raser produces well over 65% of its total capacity as I read it. Not bad for a first generation technology. I often work with the University of Utah's EGI (Energy and Geoscience Institute) and I am very pleased to see geothermal finally getting some attention.

 

Posted // September 6,2010 at 21:56 - Your right (partially), Green Energy, I didn't know that Raser is, in fact, ramping up its contracted amount of energy delivered to the city of Anaheim and that its current plant is not yet built-out to the point of being able to deliver the full amount called for in the contract. That, however, is being phased in according to Dave West of Raser who I just chatted with by phone. And while I certainly also support solar development, the numbers you provided would only be true if the earth stopped rotating so Utah faced the sun constantly, if it no longer tipped on its axis to let us always have summer intensity and there was never a cloud in the sky. The Salt Palace's numbers (while impressive) are far less than you suggest from the peak production capacity you mentioned. But let me repeat...GO SOLAR. If Germany, which is at the latitude of Ontario, Canada, can be a world leader in solar development, we sure as hell can do more, too. Btw, I'd spoken to Mayor Corroon while researching this article (unfortunately, there wasn't room to include his comments), but he is very pro-renewables. In addition to pushing the Salt Palace solar project, he also mentioned that two county community rec centers are in the process of getting heat from ground source heat pumps...the non-water "geothermal" source that only requires drilling to a couple hundred feet.